Re: [Vo]:RE: The megafarad capacitor

wrote: > ...I think we have been here before. You can just carry water in the > vehicle, > and electrolyze it in situ, a minute quantity at a time, as required. > There need > be no stored gas, and no danger. > Mizuno and others who know a lot about hydrogen tell me that

Re: [Vo]:RE: The megafarad capacitor

wrote: > > >right. In other words, the overhead is small; 1 MJ of electricity produces > >enough hydrogen to generate 5e13 MJ of heat. > > > I think you have dropped about 7 orders of magnitude. ;) I wouldn't put it past me. I think I was looking at the numbers for D+D

Re: [Vo]:RE: The megafarad capacitor

For some time to come, fuel cells for portable products will be just a novelty/stunt. In the best case scenario, they are a battery charger supplying constant current because they are much harder to throttle than a lithium battery, particularly as they get miniaturized. A serious problem for

RE: [Vo]:RE: The megafarad capacitor

Jones sez: ... > Having a bank roll of $200 billion in liquid assets will let you do > crazy things like move all the way from computeres into automotive > - when the time is right. I suppose they could just buy Toyota and > be done with it. LOL! GOOD example of having lots of

Re: [Vo]:RE: The megafarad capacitor

Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: > Regarding generating a hydrogen infrastructure, many years ago I recall > Dr. Peter Zimmerman (Dr. Mills' worst nemesis) claiming we should redirect > many of our nuclear plants towards the primary task of cracking H2O into >

Re: [Vo]:RE: The megafarad capacitor

Jed with your numbers, which I am sure you have right, it seems to me that nuclear power is great for H production when we implemented LENR on a local level. Those mega investment that never can be economically sound could get a second life. I think if you are in France solar is an alternative

Re: [Vo]:RE: The megafarad capacitor

Lennart Thornros wrote: Jed with your numbers, which I am sure you have right . . . > No necessarily! You should not trust my arithmetic. I sometimes drop 1 or 2 orders of magnitude. . . . it seems to me that nuclear power is great for H production when we > implemented

Re: [Vo]:RE: The megafarad capacitor

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:42:22 -0400: Hi, [snip] >In actual applications I would expect each factory making cold fusion >engines or power supplies to generate their own purified hydrogen, or to >bring in a tank of hydrogen every week or so. The hydrogen source in

Re: [Vo]:RE: The megafarad capacitor

In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 24 Sep 2015 20:42:22 -0400: Hi, [snip] >right. In other words, the overhead is small; 1 MJ of electricity produces >enough hydrogen to generate 5e13 MJ of heat. > I think you have dropped about 7 orders of magnitude. ;) You have a ratio of 1:5e13. It