On 04/26/2011 01:02 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 10:50 PM 4/25/2011, Mark Iverson wrote:
FYI:
Here's an article for all you theorists...
Scientists suggest spacetime has no time dimension
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-04-scientists-spacetime-dimension.html
-Mark
No problem ...
I have no problem with lack of a Time dimension but there must still
remain at least one additional spatial dimension. The fact that we are
confined into a 3 dimensional plane only makes the detection more difficult.
What we refer to as future and past becomes blurred by gamma when an object
is
I think a satisfying view of time is that the universe consists of Nothing
But Motion, the physics of Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal System -- that is
the primary constituent of the universe is a unit of motion which is
space/time and it can support 3 dimensions of motion, so space and time are
just
At 09:02 AM 4/26/2011, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 10:50 PM 4/25/2011, Mark
Iverson wrote:
FYI:
Here's an article for all you
theorists...
Scientists suggest spacetime has no
time dimension
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-04-scientists-spacetime-dimension.html
-Mark
No problem ...
At 10:50 PM 4/25/2011, Mark Iverson wrote:
FYI:
Here's an article for all you
theorists...
Scientists suggest spacetime has no
time dimension
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-04-scientists-spacetime-dimension.html
-Mark
No problem ... progressing from one state to another is pretty much
5 matches
Mail list logo