Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Eric Walker
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: > It is interesting to think about in light of our recent measurement of > high energy emissions from the Ni-H reaction. If the Ni-H reaction really > does generate MeV class electrons, they could be useful in the

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Bob Higgins
You can get high electric fields at small scale, but that is not the same as having a total electric potential of 500kV. In a vacuum, a 500kV potential can generate 500keV electrons. It is interesting to think about in light of our recent measurement of high energy emissions from the Ni-H

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Eric Walker
I wrote: This one talks about transmuting thorium and radium ... > Sorry, that's thorium and uranium. Eric

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Eric Walker
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Chris Zell wrote: I believe the Barker patent suggested that you could transmute silver into > rhodium if you could come up with a couple million volts (DC) for a number > of hours. Perhaps you're thinking of another patent by Barker.

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: Santilli is seldom talked about because he has a decades old history of > suing everyone who questions his work. > You don't even need to question his work. I had never heard of the guy and he sent sent me a letter threatening to sue me! I think it was in

RE: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Jones Beene
From: eric.wal...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:57:26 -0600 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei? To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: Has stimulated beta decay been considered here alrea

RE: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Stephen Cooke
The Patent is still interesting though. From: stephen_coo...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 17:07:09 +0100 The whole patent is interesting in my opinion. But look at the graphs in Figure 6… look a little bi

RE: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Chris Zell
accepted theory – which means they must be rejected by the priests of physics. From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 10:57 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei? On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Bob Higgins
sed broad profile. > > Figure 7 looks quite interesting too ;) > > -- > From: eric.wal...@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:57:26 -0600 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei? > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > > On Thu, Feb 2

RE: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Stephen Cooke
interesting too ;) From: eric.wal...@gmail.com Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:57:26 -0600 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei? To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: Has stimulated beta decay been considered here a

Re: [Vo]:Stimulated Beta decay of resonant nuclei?

2016-02-25 Thread Eric Walker
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Stephen Cooke wrote: Has stimulated beta decay been considered here already? I found this old but interesting patent application by Rugerro Santilli > from 2003 on line. > http://www.google.com/patents/US20030016774 > Is it