Jones,
very impressive, but I understood next to nothing.
Now Mills produced a voluminous body of alternative theory, which wikipedia
rightly cites as
...One of the motivations for developing the novel theory was to find
physical laws that are EXACT ON ALL SCALES, thereby [overcoming] the
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If the f/H in an ocean environment eventually sinks, due to increased
density and magnetic susceptibility - does this not provide an explanation
for some of the interior heat of the planet? (formerly attributed to
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 28 Jul 2012 09:48:39 -0700:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
Anyway, K has three ionization potentials: 4.3eV, 31.6eV and 45.8 eV and the
combination of all of them is 81.8eV which is a Rydberg multiple that is
within range. That is, since 27.2*3 + 81.6eV... voila.. and
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:40:06 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If the f/H in an ocean environment eventually sinks, due to increased
density and magnetic susceptibility - does this not provide an
Robin,
You completely understood the post.
This was NOT about how Mills thinks it works. We have know for 20 years how
he thinks it works.
Instead, it is about how potassium works in an alternative but non-Millsean,
non-nuclear view; or better yet - how it works in fact.
Jones
-Original
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 28 Jul 2012 20:29:06 -0700:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
Robin,
You completely understood the post.
This was NOT about how Mills thinks it works. We have know for 20 years how
he thinks it works.
Instead, it is about how potassium works in an alternative but
6 matches
Mail list logo
