-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:grok is removed temporarily
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Harry Veeder wrote:
Grok said no thanks, to the above.
I am not sure why he should apologize for his off-topic postings,
Political posting sent here, rather than to vtxB.
If you expect him to reveal his true
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Mark S Bilk wrote:
I should have stood up for Grok, because his comments (at least the ones
I read) were accurate,
His online behavior attracted complaints. Obviously his politics are
not the issue. Perhaps you didn't read enough of his messages?
Bill, please reinstate
My email doesnt have my real name anymore, due to a few reasons, but
its the one i use becuase its my main email. i could easily
resubscribe to this list with one that has my name. enh.
For all those defending him, i agree with grok politically more than i
do anyone else here, it seems, but the
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Mark Iverson wrote:
I think most everyone I'm aware of on this list has apologized at one
time or another... It's what a person with integrity does when they
realize their mistake or transgression.
Trademarks of the troll/flamer/fsckhead are, refusal to apologize, plus
use
is something he
hasn't shown either.
That's an ad hominem attack made without supporting evidence.
Mark S Bilk
http://www.cosmicpenguin.com
-Original Message-
From: William Beaty [mailto:bi...@eskimo.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 10:54 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:grok
Here I was thinking this whole terrorist thing was a bull crap, but now I
see there are terrorists literally everywhere, even on this list, even on
the chair I'm sitting in...
I guess if you have a web of lies anyone who insists on the truth becomes a
terrorist...
The U.S. government has said
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, John Berry wrote:
I guess if you have a web of lies anyone who insists on the truth becomes a
terrorist...
No, that's just dishonest. The truth is simple: anyone who posts
political observations to a list that has a ban on politics... may
attract a moderator response
You know what they say...
If it looks, walks and quacks like a duck (troll), it probably is.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: William Beaty [mailto:bi...@eskimo.com]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 12:52 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:grok is removed temporarily
On Sun, 7 Jun
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Horace Heffner wrote:
Long term contributers of scientific discussion here are typically
tolerated more than newcomers,
I've noticed that it's not the length of time a person has been here.
Instead, what makes all the difference is their willingness to become part
of the
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, William Beaty wrote:
To resubscribe, I require that he apologize for his off-topic postings,
reveal his identity, and promise to eliminate all political commentary.
Grok said no thanks, to the above.
(( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
William Beaty wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, William Beaty wrote:
To resubscribe, I require that he apologize for his off-topic postings,
reveal his identity, and promise to eliminate all political commentary.
Grok said no thanks, to the above.
I say good riddence to the troll.
- Original Message -
From: William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com
Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009 10:30 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:grok is removed temporarily
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, William Beaty wrote:
To resubscribe, I require that he apologize for his off-topic
postings, reveal his identity
:27:41PM -0400, Harry Veeder wrote:
- Original Message -
From: William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com
Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009 10:30 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:grok is removed temporarily
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, William Beaty wrote:
To resubscribe, I require that he apologize for his off-topic
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Harry Veeder wrote:
Grok said no thanks, to the above.
I am not sure why he should apologize for his off-topic postings,
Political posting sent here, rather than to vtxB.
If you expect him to reveal his true identity then that should be
written in the rules.
Nope. If
William Beaty wrote:
To resubscribe, I require that he apologize for his off-topic postings,
reveal his identity, and promise to eliminate all political commentary.
I'd like to require him spell properly.
--- Get FREE High Speed Internet from USFamily.Net! --
Horace's comments are thoughtful. I'm also aware that Mr. Heffner has
most likely been a member of the Vort Collective far longer than I,
and as such, has earned certain privileges that seniority bestows when
expressing policy matters.
If one adheres to the spirit of Vort-etiquette it would
On Jun 5, 2009, at 3:54 AM, William Beaty wrote:
Perhaps the group needs to come up with an actual rule to describe the
acceptible amount of politics/religion messages here? Normally the
complaints from other group members would give warning enough.
My opinion is that things have worked
17 matches
Mail list logo
