Re: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-28 Thread Terry Blanton
PDF version: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBeUdnZkprSlhPTWs/view?usp=sharing On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:55 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: Well, if you enjoyed the brevity of Rossi's patent, you'll hate the details of Industrial Light and Magic, er, Industrial Heat's

Re: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-28 Thread Daniel Rocha
Although he didn't test the dogbones until high temperatures, Rossi did use the emissivity temperatures for alumina contained in the literature, which correctly corresponded to the dogbones at low temperatures. So, at least it was a better analysis than the 32 day test on Upsala. 2015-08-28 3:15

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-28 Thread Jones Beene
From: Terry Blanton PDF version: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8mt4mJOTGvBeUdnZkprSlhPTWs/view?usp=sharing Ø Well, if you enjoyed the brevity of Rossi's patent, you'll hate the details of Industrial Light and Magic, er, Industrial Heat's … One detail which seems to be missing

Re: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-28 Thread mixent
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 28 Aug 2015 01:55:26 -0400: Hi, [snip] Well, if you enjoyed the brevity of Rossi's patent, you'll hate the details of Industrial Light and Magic, er, Industrial Heat's world app:

Re: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread Lennart Thornros
I have the opinion that patents are just costly and a way for patent lawyers to suck money out of inventors.. It really does not protect. Read Jones's idea about how the fight about the right claim is already in full swing and they are lawyering up. Another thing is that I think another way to

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread a.ashfield
Jones, Further to what you wrote, Rossi's stated plan is to win the commercial battle by selling first, selling it so cheaply it is not worth competing with the name brand. In order to do this he has to have a patent to protect against others stopping him through their patents. The court

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread Jones Beene
From: Blaze Spinnaker 6)Randell Mills has been on record for well over one year as saying that “LiAlH4 + Ni as a hydrogen dissociator run at elevated temperature is disclosed in my patents.” [filed in Russia and the USA.] It is likely that Rossi’s disclosure would otherwise fit into the

Re: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread Axil Axil
Who was awarded the potassium patent or was it deemed by Rossi and his legal team to be open source. Rossi's low heat reactor (1 Megawatt version) must use a potassium based fuel. A Lithium based fuel must run in a reactor with and operating temperature of over 1000C. Is Rossi conceding the Big

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread a.ashfield
Rossi has talked about a Mouse to go with the E-Cat but we haven't seen one yet. I'm guessing this is probably a very small E-Cat that supplies heat in a controlled way to the main E-Cat. Strange how all my comments end up at the bottom of the list. This makes it difficult to follow the

Re: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread Axil Axil
Rossi said that the COP of the mouse is (1.1). The mouse must produce meson, muons and other subatomic particles via induced rydberg matter that reacts with the Cats that surround it to induce a LENR based chain reaction inside the Cats. On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:46 PM, a.ashfield

Re: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread Axil Axil
From MFMP as follows: @Ecco Filing date Nov 27, 2012 Priority date Nov 27, 2011 Also published as US20150162104, WO2013076378A2, WO2013076378A3 Inventors Pekka Soininen From this patent https://www.google.com/patents/EP2783369A2?cl=en [0116] In an embodiment of the present invention styrene

Re: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread Axil Axil
In one important way, Rossi's catalytic approach is more powerful than that of Pekka Soininen. Rossi uses up to 100 micron nickel particles which are sintered together from 5 micron COTS powder. The EMF power application that these particles produce is proportional to the SIZE SPREAD of the

Re: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread Terry Blanton
Well, if you enjoyed the brevity of Rossi's patent, you'll hate the details of Industrial Light and Magic, er, Industrial Heat's world app: http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/08/27/industrial-heat-files-new-international-patent-for-energy-producing-reaction-devices/

Re: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
6)Randell Mills has been on record for well over one year as saying that “LiAlH4 + Ni as a hydrogen dissociator run at elevated temperature is disclosed in my patents.” [filed in Russia and the USA.] It is likely that Rossi’s disclosure would otherwise fit into the category of a

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-27 Thread Jones Beene
From: Axil Axil Who was awarded the potassium patent or was it deemed by Rossi and his legal team to be open source. Thermacore held that patent but it has expired, so yes - it is in the public domain. Jones

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-26 Thread a.ashfield
Peter and Jones, Rossi has recently stated he is working on 64 more patents. I suspect this first patent was driven by the desire to get something patented. The US Patent Office is dead set against cold fusion and you probably noticed neither cold fusion nor LENR were mentioned, but rather

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-26 Thread Jones Beene
From: Peter Gluck Ø Rossi has no competition, makes the rules, leads- so this patent was necessary and is useful. It may be useful, but is difficult to imagine Rossi as leading the pack, with this as his flagship patent. The claims are very narrow, and that is very risky. BTW

RE: [Vo]:my opinion about Rossi's US patent plus daily info Aug 26, 2015

2015-08-26 Thread Jones Beene
Let’s connect the dots in the Rossi patent as it fits into the big picture (while looking for even larger implications): 1)The Claim set is very narrow, and that is risky but expedient. 2)The only protection found in this disclosure is for lithium hydride in combination with