Re: Young Earth Evidence: was Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14, 2005

2005-01-20 Thread revtec
- Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 1:55 AM Subject: Re: Young Earth Evidence: was Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14, 2005 The age of the Earth debate began with much shorter time scales. Although Niagara

Re: Young Earth Evidence: was Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14, 2005

2005-01-20 Thread Harry Veeder
revtec at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 1:55 AM Subject: Re: Young Earth Evidence: was Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14, 2005 The age of the Earth debate began

RE: Young Earth Evidence: was Re: WHAT'S NEW Friday, January 14, 2005

2005-01-19 Thread Keith Nagel
Hi Jeff. You write: When I was fifteen years old, a local business backfilled an area to extend a parking lot. They used ash from a coal fired power station to fill the area to over 10 ft deep. At some time later, a 20 minute thunderstorm cut an 8 ft deep gully through the semi-stable ash. I