Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

Bob Greenyer has a new video that proposes a method to determine which theory is right and then goes on the talk about muon generation. It is a curiously awkward presentation and you can safely skip the first nine minutes.

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:59:40 +1000: Hi, BTW, after distribution of reaction energy over both the new Ni59 nucleus and the proton, the proton ends up with 6.66 MeV which rounds nicely to 6.7 MeV. [snip] >If the measured energy of the proton is 6.7 MeV,

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

In reply to a.ashfield's message of Sun, 28 Aug 2016 18:01:40 -0400: Hi, [snip] >Reviewing Lewan's piece, with the videos by the Greenyer, linked below, >he makes a good case for process being basically the swap of a nickel's >electron by a hydrogen ion.

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

There appears to be no OFAC certification in this instance. There's Henry Johnson's warranty that JM Chemicals is in compliance with OFAC (p. 25 of the complaint). There's no reason to think that JMC was in violation of OFAC by trading with an enemy of the US. Presumably what fraud there is

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

True, the IH/Rossi contrace is contingent upon te certification of the customer. It would be stupid to misrepresent this certication, but anything is possible if improbable. Such misrepresentation is a criminal offence. *How much are the fines for violating these regulations?* The fines for

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Axil Axil wrote: How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process? > How could one conclude that JM obtained OFAC certification? We go through this again. Eric

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

How could a fraudulent company pass through the OFAC certication process? On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > a.ashfield wrote: > > >> I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant >> that Rossi was a

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

Jed, Nobody has proven anything and you jump to conclusions. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 8:12

Re: [Vo]: Mats Lewan on LENR theory

a.ashfield wrote: > I don't understand how people on this forum like Jed can be so adamant > that Rossi was a fraud from day one and never produced anomalous heat. The > weight of evidence suggests that he has. > The photos of the ceiling proves he has not produced