Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

2022-10-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
H LV wrote: Since she is respected astrophysicist with nearly 600 000 subscribers and > probably many more followers this video could potentially make cold fusion > research part of mainstream science. > It sure could help! I think a much bigger help would be if the X-Prize people follow

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

2022-10-09 Thread H LV
Since she is respected astrophysicist with nearly 600 000 subscribers and probably many more followers this video could potentially make cold fusion research part of mainstream science. Harry On Sun., Oct. 9, 2022, 9:26 a.m. Jed Rothwell, wrote: > This video is not bad. But I posted one one

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

2022-10-09 Thread Jed Rothwell
This video is not bad. But I posted one one complaint in the comment section: "Hossenfelder says that no one was able to replicate several experiments. Some of those were replicated. No one has tried to replicate the others." My point is that if several people try to replicate an experiment but

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

2022-10-08 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
Today the real reputation risk is to teach/promote Standard model nonsense. I made a summary of all crappy ideas these folks invented over the past 100 years:: https://vixra.org/abs/2209.0037 The central error has been made by Dirac that did claim a particle can act wave like and couples the

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion is Back (there's just one problem)

2022-10-08 Thread H LV
Sabine Hossenfelder is an astrophysicist who runs a "no nonsense" science channel. As she acknowledges in the video she is taking a risk talking about cold fusion because it is considered a reputation trap among physicists. Harry On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 1:55 PM H LV wrote: > "Cold Fusion is Back