concepts of a QM system at odds with each other.
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 11:42 PM
To: vortex-l<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Preliminary survey on cold fusion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v
It seems correct that Jurg made the comment which I also agree is valid.
Bob Cooks
From: Robin<mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au>
Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 2:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Preliminary survey on
Hi guys long time,
Your discussion of gravity is way over my paygrade. However, if gravity is
such a power , how can the two bodies of the esrth on one side and the O2
molecule keep together. In other words why do the gases in the atmosphere
stay there. I was told in school that nature hates
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Tue, 7 Dec 2021 20:33:39
+:
Hi Bob,
>Robin-
>
>You make a significant statement:
>
> The strong force myth has been fully debunked by B.Schaeffer
Actually I didn't make that statement, I simply pointed to a website that I
believe belongs
housed in the Cornell
University technical paper archive.
Bob Cook
--
From: Robin<mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au>
Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 11:39 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Preliminary survey on
gt;
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows
>
>
>
> *From: *Axil Axil
> *Sent: *Monday, December 6, 2021 2:11 AM
> *To: *vortex-
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 6 Dec 2021 12:34:22 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>The strong force myth has been fully debunked by B.Schaeffer
>
, December 6, 2021 2:11 AM
To: vortex-l<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Preliminary survey on cold fusion
Because the nuclear level processes that occur in the Reaction are confined to
a quantum mechanical system that is coherent, that nuclear reaction is not
p
link/?LinkId=550986>
for Windows
*From:* Axil Axil
*Sent:* Saturday, December 4, 2021 5:59:44 PM
*To:* vortex-l
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Preliminary survey on cold fusion
Thankyou for your opinion. A nuclear reaction produces energy
gt;
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows
>
>
> ----------
> *From:* Axil Axil
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 4, 2021 5:59:44 PM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Preliminary survey on cold f
tps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Saturday, December 4, 2021 5:59:44 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Preliminary survey on cold fusion
Thankyou for your opinion. A nuclear reaction produces energy from a
Axil, as said stop this unfounded postings about particles.
In LENR we only see stable targets of any reaction. Thus no unstable
nuclei are produced in most cases. The only thing what might happen is
beta +- decay of an intermediate.
If 2 D* fuse to 4-He then no momentum exists. So no
> The LENR reaction conserves energy and angular momentum.
>
>
>
> The engineering of nano-entangled- QM systems, that provide necessary
> phonic and nuclear isomeric states, created with the introduction of a
> controlling magnetic field, is IMHO the crux of LENR success.
>
&g
Thankyou for your opinion. A nuclear reaction produces energy from a change
in the binding energy of the nucleus. When this binding energy changes, the
nucleus will become unstable where the liberated binding energy is
oftentimes carried away by a particle(s) exiting the nucleus.
If the Reaction
Axil,
You basically are a nonsense talker with no clue of real dense matter
physics.
A particle emission is associated with a momentum. How do you believe
that mass at rest can produce this???
J.W.
On 04.12.2021 19:36, Axil Axil wrote:
Also identify what
rgy and angular momentum.
The engineering of nano-entangled- QM systems, that provide necessary phonic
and nuclear isomeric states, created with the introduction of a controlling
magnetic field, is IMHO the crux of LENR success.
This nano engineering started with control of the Pd electrode crys
ed in the P-F tests.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for
> Windows
>
>
>
> *From: *Jones Beene
> *Sent: *Saturday, December 4, 2021 9:59 AM
> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject: *Re: [V
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 4 Dec 2021 19:09:55 +0100:
Hi,
Even if they do, I'm sure Jed would be willing to add it to the LENR-CANR
repository.
>May be soon if the standard model mafia will not oppose
>
>
>J.W.
>
>On 04.12.2021 18:59, Jones Beene wrote:
>>
>> Jürg
in the P-F tests.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
From: Jones Beene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 4, 2021 9:59 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Freire et al., Prelimin
Also identify what fusion and/or fission reaction that this gamma radiation
is coming from. Show proof that this radiation is associated with
particle emissions. Nuclear reactions produce well defined
particle emissions. Also explain how the reaction is being produced. Keep
in mind that high
May be soon if the standard model mafia will not oppose
J.W.
On 04.12.2021 18:59, Jones Beene wrote:
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
Axil, I can send you any time a gamma spectrum with 300 active lines
from a cold fusion reaction...
-
Is this work published?
It should be included in the
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
Axil, I can send you any time a gamma spectrum with 300 active lines from a
cold fusion reaction...-
Is this work published?
It should be included in the LENR/CANR library, especially if the gamma lines
support a theory
Axil,
I can send you any time a gamma spectrum with 300 active lines from a
cold fusion reaction. Also the SO(4) physics models blows up everything
you know about physics.
So your comment is pretty outdated.
J.W.
On 04.12.2021 08:49, Axil Axil wrote:
The indications against the
The indications against the "REACTION" having a nuclear origin is the issue
that no nuclear or particle radiation is ever detected. Also all reaction
products and transmutation are stable. No one has ever produced or even
attempted a theory that explains the nuclear origin of the radiationless
24 matches
Mail list logo
