On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I doubt that an economic or structural panacea exists.
Of course not.
However, to throw your hands up and say that no economic or structural
modifications are worth while is
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I doubt that an economic or structural panacea exists.
Of course not.
However, to throw your hands up and say that no economic or structural
modifications are worth while is
Another route McKubre raised was direct political action to get funding
earmarked so as to bypass the bureaucratic pecking order.
I tried that with R. T. Jones' oblique all wing design and it backfired.
What happened was I visited Jones at his home in the hills above Silicon
Valley around the
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The next year, when the money was supposed to become available, NASA HQ
punished NASA Ames for going over their head (even though it was a
grassroots organization chaired by yours truly) by reducing the
discretionary budget for NASA Ames by an amount
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am not being cynical. That's the way the world works. Almost all of it.
The only reason some corporations deviate from that pattern is because they
love money more than politics.
That's why I concluded, in 1992 when
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:02 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I am not being cynical. That's the way the world works. Almost all of it.
The only reason some corporations deviate from that pattern is because
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
That's why I concluded, in 1992 when this all occurred (on top of the
problems with NASA basically thumbing their collective noses at the Launch
Services Purchase Act of 1990) the only way to attack
bureaucratic intransigence in both the private as well
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
That's why I concluded, in 1992 when this all occurred (on top of the
problems with NASA basically thumbing their collective noses at the Launch
Services Purchase Act of 1990)
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I doubt that an economic or structural panacea exists.
Of course not.
However, to throw your hands up and say that no economic or structural
modifications are worth while is a bit too defeatist for my taste.
Not true. I favor incremental changes. A
http://media.podshow.com/media/1049/episodes/318736/pesn-318736-08-29-2012.mp3
Is a dead link.
Moreover, the link you provided was in error syntactically:
http://m.podshow.com/media/1049/episodes/318736/pesn-318736-08-29-2012.mp3Interview
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Axil Axil
This link to the audio works:
http://www.mevio.com/episode/318736/fen.120828
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://m.podshow.com/media/1049/episodes/318736/pesn-318736-08-29-2012.mp3Interview
Listen
On August 28, Sterling Allan conducted an interview
At about 10 minutes into the interview, the question that is most relevant
crops up, which is how can one overcome the block on scientific
publication. This is most relevant because it gets to the heart science
itself, and the institutional incompetence currently besetting science.
Yes, I think
12 matches
Mail list logo
