Re: [Vo]:Rossi-Gullstrom paper published on July 18 on Arxiv.org

Maybe whoever is trying to develop the device alongside Rossi next time shouldn't fund his competitors.Don't piss him off. That kind of thing. Let Fred Flinstone keep his job. On 7/20/17, Axil Axil wrote: > This trillion $$ invention only works if Rossi is there at

Re: [Vo]:Rossi-Gullstrom paper published on July 18 on Arxiv.org

This trillion $$ invention only works if Rossi is there at the controls to adjust it minute by minute. It is a device that only Rossi can use. On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > What's wrong with this picture? > > Great inventor presents crappy-looking

Re: [Vo]:Rossi-Gullstrom paper published on July 18 on Arxiv.org

What's wrong with this picture? Great inventor presents crappy-looking experiment along with brain-dead theory... while at the same time, he has just completed successful test of the most valuable energy device of all time - producing an average megawatt of power over a year at a gain of at

Re: [Vo]:Rossi-Gullstrom paper published on July 18 on Arxiv.org

Is this yet another Rossi 'black' box..? Bah, then. Full disclosure. Open-Source Science -- which AFAIC includes Open-Source engineering, too. Forget becoming rich and famous. Just do it for Humanity. On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Nick wrote: > E-Cat QX Picture