On 11-12-29 12:02 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Dec 29, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-12-29 01:57 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
Having said all that, Stephen, please prove you exist.
That's a tough one.
Descartes's proof was defective, of course -- it proved only that I
On 29 Dec 2011, at 14:17, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Having said all that, Stephen, please prove you exist.
That's a tough one.
Descartes's proof was defective, of course -- it proved only that I do not
see how I could not exist, not that I could not possibly not exist. Among
other
On 11-12-29 01:57 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
mailto:sa...@pobox.com wrote:
On 11-12-28 08:40 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
Unless I'm greatly mistaken, you've accused a number of people of
failing to exist.
The only
Come on guys! What the proof is of the existence of this big customer ? A
lot of Rossi's words of course, a mysteriuos engineer named Fioravanti
(Colonel uh ?) Retired ? Unenployed ? Not appearing anywhere in any
phonebook or internet professional board ... ?!
Just for the record, Fioravanti is
On Dec 29, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-12-29 01:57 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence
sa...@pobox.com wrote:
On 11-12-28 08:40 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
Unless I'm greatly mistaken, you've accused a number of people of
On Dec 29, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-12-29 12:02 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Dec 29, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-12-29 01:57 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
Having said all that, Stephen, please prove you exist.
That's a tough one.
In ecatnews.com http://ecatnews.com/?p=1727, Paul Story commented:
[The idea that we have two fraudulant entities outbidding each
other in an open exchange of illusionary pricing – shouting at
each other from opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean – is too
bizarre to be given space except in
Paul Story wrote:
[The idea that we have two fraudulant entities outbidding each
other in an open exchange of illusionary pricing – shouting at
each other from opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean – is too
bizarre to be given space except in recognising it as a small
possibility.]
Add to
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Add to that a scenario in which Defkalion has set up a large, expensive
fake laboratory staffed by genuine experts being paid to pretend they are
doing research. The whole notion is so implausible I can't imagine why
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
What *is* likely is that Defkalion believed that they were going to
receive a working core module from Rossi in June 2011. It is also likely
that they prepared equipment and labs based on what they thought this core
would be like according to
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
The people who have been there can estimate that by looking. They know
what laboratory equipment costs.
Wouldn't it be nice if we could hear from these people directly and see
photos of what they saw (within the
Mary Yugo wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if we could hear from these people directly and
see photos of what they saw (within the needed limits to protect trade
secrets)?
I am trying to arrange that. It might help if you and others would stop
making outrageous, baseless, ignorant attacks against
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I am trying to arrange that. It might help if you and others would stop
making outrageous, baseless, ignorant attacks against them. Generally
speaking, people are not inclined to share information when you accuse them
Mary Yugo wrote:
I don't recall accusing anyone of anything. I raise possibilities
which should be very easy to knock down.
You do accuse people. You make endlessly repeated ignorant, snide
comments about subjects you know nothing about. You could easily learn
about these things, but you
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Titanic step forward? Better is gigantic management strategy blunder!
To use mild euphemisms- this plan is naive, childish, primitive savage
capitalistic thinking and self-destructive strategy.
To use dumping on an endless, insatiable market- you cannot
Perhaps it would be necessary to define better
|experienced business man Obviously you learn from bitter failures (as
Petroldragon) but the experience of successful campaigns is irrreplaceable
see e.g. Jobs' career -succces breeds succes.
To frighten Defkalion? How exactly? They are really
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
I don't recall accusing anyone of anything. I raise possibilities which
should be very easy to knock down.
You do accuse people.
Cite it or don't say it. Who did I accuse and of what and where
On 11-12-28 08:40 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Mary Yugo wrote:
I don't recall accusing anyone of anything. I raise
possibilities which should be very easy to knock down.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
**
On 11-12-28 08:40 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
Unless I'm greatly mistaken, you've accused a number of people of failing
to exist.
The only allegation of non existence I've ever made is the non-existence of
a proper and
Titanic step forward? Better is gigantic management strategy blunder!
To use mild euphemisms- this plan is naive, childish, primitive savage
capitalistic thinking and self-destructive strategy.
To use dumping on an endless, insatiable market- you cannot succeed even
with a hundred million E-cats.
20 matches
Mail list logo
