Rossi did not even answer the question. lol
Harry
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Francesco Fiorenzani
December 10th, 2011 at 10:03 AM
Dear Andrea Rossi
In your opinion the collaboration with University of Bologna
will start before the next March or
Well, if the testing has already begun, if is being flatly denied by UNIBO:
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/12/01/university-of-bologna-clarifies-relationship-with-rossi/
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 12:46:39 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi plans to muzzle the university project for at least a
On 2011-12-11 18:46, Harry Veeder wrote:
Rossi did not even answer the question. lol
I think we should now expect Rossi to not activate (i.e. pay) his
contract with the University of Bologna in January, and see him come out
at some point with a [mostly] undisclosed report of an undisclosed
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
wrote:
Let's hope that Defkalion GT or other scientists (supposedly close to
reaching commercially viable results) won't back off from reputable,
independent, thorough testing at the last minute or postpone it
On 2011-12-11 19:28, Mary Yugo wrote:
[...]
Is there any reason to believe anything Defkalion claims at this point?
Basing on recently disclosed information, independent testing should
occur within the first months of next year. Confidential information at
my disposal also leads me to
You are right that Rossi and Defkalion did proof nothing certain.
but We have to understand that in the business logic(unscientific) they
have no incentive to prove anything to us, the opposite.
they just have incentive to prove to their clients, and convince others
nothing works, until
Agreed. 1 year exceeds my subjective deadline of October 28th. Time to move
on...
2011/12/11 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
On 2011-12-11 18:46, Harry Veeder wrote:
Rossi did not even answer the question. lol
I think we should now expect Rossi to not activate (i.e. pay) his
Mary, and many LENR-under-informed or patho-skeptics, point to things like
this as evidence to support their beliefs:
Nor is there any evidence that Defkalion, as they claimed, provided devices
to the Greek authorities for safety and efficacy testing and certification.
A member of the Greek
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Mary, and many LENR-under-informed or patho-skeptics, point to things like
this as evidence to support their beliefs
Name calling now? Nice. What, exactly is a patho-skeptic? Someone who
doubts a
Mary:
You should read the entire thread which ended with the following exchange
between me and Terry:
Mark Iverson:
Didn't they change the location to Cypress? Or was that just rumor? I
tend to gloss over the non-technical details.
Terry Blanton:
Defkalion Green Technologies is
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
“So, has anyone checked to see if Defkalion has filed an application
with the
appropriate agency on Cypress??? Probably not... at least not yet!”
Except that Defkalion specifically said their
That they promised to heat the police academy was before they broke up with
Rossi, right?
2011/12/11 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
“So, has anyone checked to see if Defkalion has filed an application
Mary wrote:
That none of this appears to be true is indeed evidence-- evidence that
Defkalion was lying.
NO, IT IS NOT EVIDENCE THAT THEY ARE LYING!
There are a number of explanations which are just as plausible:
- knowledge of the application's existence has not made it up to
I don't know Daniel. but that's certainly a relevant point.
I've only skimmed these kinds of topics since they rarely prove ANYTHING,
positive or negative.
I have only been engaging in the discussion lately in an attempt to raise
the SNR of this forum.
-mark
From: Daniel Rocha
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
That they promised to heat the police academy was before they broke up
with Rossi, right?
I think that's correct. But they also claimed they have their own
technology and don't need Rossi. In fact their Hyperion
No, not name calling. it is a valid term according to many definitive
references, this one from Webster's Online Dictionary:
The terms Pathological skepticism and Pseudoskepticism were coined, by
Marcello Truzzi (sociology professor at Eastern Michigan University), in the
early 1990s in response
Mary wrote:
Someone who doubts a convicted felon who makes extravagant claims and then
won't provide definitive proof that is extremely easy, safe and cheap to
come by?
Oh brother. not that again. As usual, the material regarding Rossi's
questionable history has been rehashed numerous times
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Where did that phrase you apparently quoted out of context come from
anyway?”
What phase are you referring to?
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
It's cute but often wrong.
I guess we
18 matches
Mail list logo
