To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: Steven Krivit stev...@newenergytimes.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia blacklists LENR-CANR.org
In-Reply-To: f7eeb3430901150742n75cd3178n413dc0b443ca3...@mail.gmail.co
m
References: 7.0.1.0.2.20090114181346.03751...@gmail.com
7.0.1.0.2.20090114180724.038f7...@gmail.com
Steven Krivit wrote:
I suppose it would be fair to inform you that I have been aware for a few
weeks that user JxG, (Guy Chapman from the U.K.) blacklisted both of our
sites on Dec. 18.
Is that so? It is unimportant.
Yours, I think, was upgraded (by JzG's encouragement) to an
Terry,
Which one is your ip?
Steve
At 06:55 AM 1/17/2009, you wrote:
Delivered-To: hohlr...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.65.110.6 with SMTP id n6cs72790qbm;
[snip]
My machine address would not show on a webap mailer; however, Google
can verify a valid recipient of a message.
Terry
On 1/17/09, Steven Krivit stev...@newenergytimes.com wrote:
Terry,
Which one is your ip?
Steve
At 06:55 AM 1/17/2009, you wrote:
Delivered-To: hohlr...@gmail.com
Piki?
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:55 PM, R C Macaulay walha...@cvtv.net wrote:
Howdy Jed,
At some point in time an awareness arrives that Wiki is a closed society
website disguised as an open forum and posting information source.
Like the joke about inspectors.. one can argue with an
Terry sez:
Piki?
I must confess that I use Wiki (Oink-Oink-Piki!) a lot. It's a quik
invaluable informational resource for NON CONTROVERSIAL subjects.
It should be obvious to anyone by now that relying on Wiki for
information on issues possessing a modicum of controversy is
indicative of lazy
unless, as I've heard you used Gmail which does not include originating IP
in the headers.
can anybody confirm/disconfirm?
At 07:42 AM 1/15/2009, you wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
A link meaning what? A copy of an e-mail message? That can
Jed,
I suppose it would be fair to inform you that I have been aware for a few
weeks that user JxG, (Guy Chapman from the U.K.) blacklisted both of our
sites on Dec. 18. Yours, I think, was upgraded (by JzG's encouragement) to
an international Wikimedia meta blacklist. People in Italy are
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
A link meaning what? A copy of an e-mail message? That can easily be
faked.
Not if you include the hidden header information. It becomes
entirely traceable.
Terry
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:30:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
The gist of the argument appears to be that you need explicit permission in
each
case. Since you claim to have such permission, perhaps you could include a
link
with each uploaded
Howdy Jed,
At some point in time an awareness arrives that Wiki is a closed society
website disguised as an open forum and posting information source.
Like the joke about inspectors.. one can argue with an inspector.. but like
wrestling with a pig in the mud.. sooner or later.. it dawns on
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:17:11 -0500:
Hi Jed,
[snip]
As you may have noticed, your site http://lenr-canr.org has been
added to Wikipedia's blacklist of SPAM sites. I believe this is
missuse of the spam blacklisting process to enforce a narrow point-of-view.
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
The gist of the argument appears to be that you need explicit permission in
each
case. Since you claim to have such permission, perhaps you could include a
link
with each uploaded paper pointing to the explicit permission you received
for
that paper, or where
13 matches
Mail list logo
