Re: [Vo]:answer to Ethan Siegel, LENR is a scientific Pechvogel

ed to load the Palladium with sufficient Deuterium for > the process to start. > > I could add pages of proved experiments to what Katakis wrote but there is > no point when you won't look at it. > > > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Re: [Vo]:answ

Re: [Vo]:answer to Ethan Siegel, LENR is a scientific Pechvogel

is no point when you won't look at it. Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: [Vo]:answer to Ethan Siegel, LENR is a scientific Pechvogel Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 14:34:31 -0400 From: a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Peter, Don't waste y

Re: [Vo]:answer to Ethan Siegel, LENR is a scientific Pechvogel

Dear Adrian I wanted make him happy with compliments as half assed paper. Repeated strick with the Turk, lousy work, literary speaking As you see if you read my answer, I know him. The rest is my opinion about LENR. peter On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 9:34 PM, a.ashfield

Re: [Vo]:answer to Ethan Siegel, LENR is a scientific Pechvogel

Peter, Don't waste your time on Ethan. From a distant email exchange I had with him about his quotations that were in error, being used in Wikipedia, he is simply not interested in looking at any evidence contrary to his previously stated opinion. AA On 9/25/2016 1:41 PM, Peter Gluck