Purdue scientist is under scrutiny
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060309/NEWS01/603090431/1006/NEWS01
Boston Globe reprints Reuters story, reuses CNN title
T+25hrs
Purdue investigates scientist over 'cold fusion' claims
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington
scientist is under scrutiny
http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060309/NEWS01/603090431/1006/NEWS01
Boston Globe reprints Reuters story, reuses CNN title T+25hrs
Purdue investigates scientist over 'cold fusion' claims
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/03/09
At 05:27 am 09/03/2006 +, you wrote:
At 06:49 pm 08/03/2006 -0900, Horace wrote:
On Mar 8, 2006, at 2:36 PM, Mitchell Swartz wrote:
Record Set for Hottest Temperature on Earth: 3.6 Billion Degrees in
Lab
Scientists have produced
Winestone wrote..
Like I tell people all the time; the ONLY way to prove that any of the
Low Energy Nuclear Reactions actually work in a practical sense, is to quickly
incorporate each into a simple prototype working device. Scientists -
especially the closed-minded (non-intuitive) ones -
I quote:
---
"I am not sure that I have ever mentioned it to you, but controlled fusion
has been a real problem with me for over 40 years. I was involved in some
of the first meetings where this crap was first promulgated. I
Hi Richard... nice hearing from you.
I'm the new guy on the Vortex block. I've been in communication with Steve
Krivit, and a few weeks ago had the pleasure of meeting him in person, when
I was in California. He put me in touch with Vortex.
laughing I'm not the most patient of people, and
-Original Message-
From: Grimer
Goodness me - Maybe they are the first people to have achieved
demonstrable cold fusion. What a laugh. 8-)
Or, the first could have been metal plating companies who caused
embrittlement of ferrite metal alloys.
Terry
Another huge problem with the bulk of media coverage on this story
is that even if Taleyarkhan or someone else turns out to be a bad
apple in terms of credibility, which may indded be the
'proximate' case...
...they failed to look at the numerous other work in the field -
some of it superior
Sorry previous message went out a little on the unripe side...
...did you (or the media) pick up on that little detail ??
...should have been a little clearer on the identity of another
possible bad apple ... or is that bad orange ...
Mr. Naranjo [the whistle blower] said that the pattern
At 10:41 am 09/03/2006 -0600, Richard wrote:
We are all growing boys and girls and know that viewing
an eyewall of a hurricane is an optical illusion because
nobody can explain scientifically how the wall can form
and sustain. But again, I see and hear lotsa things I find
unbelievable
People reported difficulty reading this paper:
McKubre, M.C.H. The Need for Triggering in Cold Fusion Reactions.
in Tenth International Conference on Cold Fusion. 2003.
A revised Acrobat version of this has been uploaded:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/McKubreMCHtheneedfor.pdf
- Jed
See:
http://rael.berkeley.edu/EBAMM/ERG-NPR-letter-1-30-06.pdf
Farrell agrees with Pimentel that ethanol takes a lot of input energy
-- although he does not specify how much in this letter. He says that
Pimentel was wrong and that the Berkeley study did take into account
the energy used by
Most of the studies I'm aware of discuss the manufacture of ethanol from
corn. I know first-hand of an interesting process that uses cellulose as
its feedstock. The reaction is via an enzyme that initially converts the
cellulose to sugar... then the normal fermentation process to ethanol.
I heard that the limit on biofuels is that they would require devoting the
entirety of our agricultural surfaces to the corresponding cultivations if
we wanted to run all our vehicles on them. Otherwise their net CO2 emission
is zero without a doubt, as all they can release to the atmosphere is
Michel Jullian wrote:
I heard that the limit on biofuels is that they would require
devoting the entirety of our agricultural surfaces to the
corresponding cultivations if we wanted to run all our vehicles on them.
I have discussed that issue here before. Actually, it would take much
more
Good point about the CO2 emissions. I don't believe it's practical to even
think about running vehicles on biofuels alone. I do believe, however,
that a percentage of vehicle fuel could be biofuel. Right now I use Sunoco
gas (in Canada) that contains a maximum of 10% ethanol. If all
Philip Winestone wrote:
Many energy expenditures occur, even/especially with oil-based
fuels. Imagine how much energy it takes to transport fuel from the
the wells to the refineries dotted about North America to the fuel
depots and then to the individual retail outlets.
Oil energy overhead
Philip Winestone wrote:
If all gasoline suppliers were to supplement their fuel with 10%
ethanol, that's simply 10% less gasoline used.
It is not that simple. The amount reduced would depend upon how much
oil is needed to produce the ethanol. That subject is sharply
disputed, but as far as
I wrote:
. . . no tractor or ethanol factory boiler is fired by ethanol, or
as all oil wells, refineries and tankers are powered by oil.
Meant: whereas all oil wells, refineries . . .
Sooner or later -- probably within 50 years -- oil production
overhead will exceed 100%. That is to say, it
Original Message-
From: ThomasClark123
According to the Unity of Creation Theory (The cosmic matrix piece for
a jigsaw puzzle part 2- Leonard G. Cramp), gravity is simply a deficit
of 1g on Earth between creative rays (cosmic/ether/compressed magnetic
rays) that push upon Earth from
An interesting article:
http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20060306/sprite_tec.html
which would tend to show that all weather is an equalization between
the ionisphere and the surface.
But what of beyond?
Tether?
T
___
Try the New Netscape
Well, I keep saying it: no corn... only cellulose, preferably waste
cellulose, of which there's lots. So there's no question of starving. In
the ethanol manufacturing process, there's really only one main user of
energy, which is the distillation operation. In addition, because ethanol
forms
In a message dated 3/9/2006 7:01:09 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, this is the basis of Sir Grimer's Beta-atmosphere conjecture. However, if you actually read the posts (input vs. output) on this list you would know this.Regards,Terry
I read many of the posts but I
It was my understanding that greenhouse gases are only those
which have the
particular characteristic of absorbing the wavelengths of reflected
radiation. It was told to me that only specific gasses, not
water vapor,
have this characteristic. Comments? Disagreements?
I don't believe that
24 matches
Mail list logo
