Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia's cold fusion entry, what's the status?

2009-09-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 01:40 AM 9/4/2009, Steven Krivit wrote: Steve and Vortex, About a year ago, I think it was, the Wikipedia cold fusion haters blacklisted New Energy Times because I added some links to - heaven forbid - the NET site which I thought would be useful. You know, the Internet is good for Wiki,

Re: [Vo]:Revised EPRI documents coming

2009-09-04 Thread Michel Jullian
Some thoughts/questions in your text below Michel 2009/9/3, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com: Steve uncovered a real treasure trove of stuff from EPRI! I urge everyone to read it. Good for Steve and good for EPRI. HOWEVER, the Acrobat files from the EPRI site are peculiar. They are bigger

RE: [Vo]:cnn.com video reports on Wikipedia: Wikipedia's credibility search

2009-09-04 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax ... For the life of me I tried to cut past in the URL to this specific Wikipedia CNN video clip but was unsuccessful. I can only suggest going to CNN.COM, click on the video link (Upper right hand corner) and scroll down 75% - 80% of the way through the video

[Vo]:Some notes on uploaded EPRI papers

2009-09-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
1. The list is of EPRI papers is here, as I mentioned: http://lenr-canr.org/News.htm Also: http://lenr-canr.org/FilesByDate.htm I may upload a few others next week. Steve Krivit has them listed and uploaded here: http://newenergytimes.com/v2/archives/EPRI-LENR-Archives.shtml Some of these

Re: [Vo]:ClockworkRubeHarbach

2009-09-04 Thread Michel Jullian
Jak, it will only work until the level in your well falls down to the level corresponding to your overhead pressure. For 45 psi = 3 atm, that's 30m below the level in the strata, i.e. more than 30m below ground. Michel 2009/9/2 Harbach Jak ja.harc...@hotmail.com: ~THE WATER-CLOCK/WATER TOWER~

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia's cold fusion entry, what's the status?

2009-09-04 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Stephen A. Lawrencesa...@pobox.com wrote: Dunno -- I'm not sure I was on the same wavelength as their search box. I think it's case sensitive: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/JzG

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia's cold fusion entry, what's the status?

2009-09-04 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
Terry Blanton wrote: On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Stephen A. Lawrencesa...@pobox.com wrote: Dunno -- I'm not sure I was on the same wavelength as their search box. I think it's case sensitive: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/JzG Oops. Thanks.

[Vo]:Text under image Acrobat files

2009-09-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Michel Jullian wrote: For pdfs with low fi underlying ocr, in my experience saving them as pure image files and then re-ocr-ing them with the latest version of Acrobat often improves the ocr quality considerably. Yes. This is because OCR accuracy has improved. It may also be because many

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia's cold fusion entry, what's the status?

2009-09-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: There is any amount of anti-cold fusion material from mainstream sources. It has no depth. Mainstream? Jed, you've swallowed a bill of goods. There is no mainstream. Or, rather, there are many. Is the ACS mainstream? Is Oxford University Press . . . Please note

[Vo]:1993 New Scientist travesty

2009-09-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
I mentioned the 1993 New Scientist article, the all-time winner for chutzpah. Here is a self-explanatory letter from Chris Tinsley to the editor of the New Scientist about the article. Martin Fleischmann and several others also wrote to the magazine, but none with such panache. The magazine

Langmuir/Hydro/NeutsNewAtom[Vo]:S-Gas/OU-Zen Device

2009-09-04 Thread Harbach Jak
* * *IRVING LANGMUIR circa 1939 Nobel Prize work showing Atomic Hydrogen recombining to form H2 at the release of 'much energy' is a demonstration of the points that I've been trying to illustrate; albeit clumsily~:-)~JH~~regards 'Casimer' alot goes on within a sustained 'cavity' at

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia's cold fusion entry, what's the status?

2009-09-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 12:33 PM 9/4/2009, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Steven Krivit wrote: I was unable to make contact with Wikipedia Administrator JzG (Guy Chapman), but some of his fan club has some things about him at encyclopediadramatica.com. Just type in jzg in the search box. Typed in jzq in the

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia's cold fusion entry, what's the status?

2009-09-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 12:07 PM 9/4/2009, Steven Krivit wrote: I was unable to make contact with Wikipedia Administrator JzG (Guy Chapman), but some of his fan club has some things about him at encyclopediadramatica.com. Just type in jzg in the search box. Don't go to encyclopediadramatica.com if you are easily

Re: [Vo]:1993 New Scientist travesty

2009-09-04 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jed Rothwelljedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: snip These comments are far from exhaustive. Should you not decide to follow this remarkable travesty of science reporting with a full and accurate article on the subject then it will at least be a matter of record that

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia's cold fusion entry, what's the status?

2009-09-04 Thread Steven Krivit
There is no page titled jzq. jzg, not jzq. Hard to see. somewhat case sensitive. so JzG is the optimal way stands for Just zis guy, slang for just this guy

Re: [Vo]:Some notes on uploaded EPRI papers

2009-09-04 Thread Steven Krivit
As I see it, these ICCF proceedings papers were never really published. Plus, people will not read papers with spelling errors and so on, so there is no point to reprinting the papers as is. So, while I have never changed the content, I did rewrite them. A few authors say I should

[Vo]:Casimir/'Time'Gyro-GravionicProtonCavitization

2009-09-04 Thread Harbach Jak
~A nod to Casimir~ MODEL of PROTON as Cavitationally Rigid while being also a dynamic energy flow system. Premise: The 'wall' of the Proton due to Gyro-Centrific speed-density is thusly dynamically Gyro-Gravionic. So internally like a micro-Dyson-Sphere containing a micro singularity

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia's cold fusion entry, what's the status?

2009-09-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 05:36 PM 9/4/2009, Jed Rothwell wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: There is any amount of anti-cold fusion material from mainstream sources. It has no depth. Mainstream? Jed, you've swallowed a bill of goods. There is no mainstream. Or, rather, there are many. Is the ACS mainstream? Is

Re: [Vo]:Casimir/'Time'Gyro-GravionicProtonCavitization

2009-09-04 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 4, 2009, at 3:22 PM, Harbach Jak wrote: ~A nod to Casimir~ MODEL of PROTON as Cavitationally Rigid while being also a dynamic energy flow system. Premise: The 'wall' of the Proton due to Gyro-Centrific speed- density is thusly dynamically Gyro-Gravionic. So internally like a

Re: [Vo]:More Abductions

2009-09-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
I did not look closely at this . . . you are talking about THE Hatoyama. Ms. Prime Minister Hatoyama. Good grief! (By the way her name is Yukiko -- -ko is a common ending in female names. And Hatoyama means Dove-mountain, and the guy does resemble a dove, or pigeon. And they call him the alien,

Re: [Vo]:More Abductions

2009-09-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Let me just add one more example that it is not contentious or politically loaded. Many Americans nowadays believe that sugar is a stimulant. For example, they believe that if their children eat sugared cereal for breakfast they will get a sugar high and race around the house causing commotion. I

Re: [Vo]:Some notes on uploaded EPRI papers

2009-09-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Steven Krivit wrote: what is the plan for the most recent [ICCF] proceedings and the forthcoming one? I finished editing all papers for the most recent proceedings a week after the final, FINAL deadline, in February or whenever it was. Nagel and Melich have had the papers ever since. They made

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia's cold fusion entry, what's the status?

2009-09-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: Please note that I did not say that all mainstream media is opposed to cold fusion. Nor did I say that they were. I said there is no mainstream. It's a myth, an appearance, a phenomenon without boundaries. However, sometimes these are useful. I think you are

Re: [Vo]:Text under image Acrobat files

2009-09-04 Thread Jed Rothwell
There are also on-line utilities that instantly remove Acrobat copy protection. But the ones I found do not work with files over 7 MB, and it doesn't seem sporting to do it that way. It isn't cricket. Anyway, you can break Acrobat copy protect as easily as a badger steals a watermelon, getting

Re: [Vo]:More Abductions

2009-09-04 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Jed Rothwelljedrothw...@gmail.com wrote: I did not look closely at this . . . you are talking about THE Hatoyama. Ms. Prime Minister Hatoyama. Good grief! No offense was intended. I found her story quite elegant. Actually, it's not unlike that of Joe Firmage.

Re: [Vo]:BB motor - surprising experiments

2009-09-04 Thread Harry Veeder
Catching up on an older post. - Original Message - From: Harry Veeder hvee...@ncf.ca Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 8:02 pm - Original Message - From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 7:21 pm On Aug 18, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Harry Veeder

Re: [Vo]:Wikipedia's cold fusion entry, what's the status?

2009-09-04 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 10:16 PM 9/4/2009, you wrote: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote: think you are quibbling. This is a bit like saying there is no Democratic Party because the Democrats are unorganized and they seldom agree among themselves. Okay, the Party may be nebulous but they have a headquarters and they