I went through the binding energy calculation for
Ni62 - Cu62 - 5.2703255625 MeV energy gain
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 1:36 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:07:31 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
*(The fact that we get so little is enshrined in the law
Hey, I have made a new image that might be more apparent for some.
And a website however basic/shoddy:
http://aethericsciences.net78.net/
The first image (after the text), open it up in a new window so it displays
are the correct size preferably.
John
Surprisingly enough, I did feel a warmth where it says Feel over the
circle even when I had my eyes closed and moved the image to a random place
first!
What's your algorithm for designing these drawings?
From: John Berry [mailto:berry.joh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 3:40
This reminds me of the Stephen King story about the fellow who had
the ability to draw an image which, when looked at by its intended
target, caused him to commit suicide a few days later.
Of course, this is benign; maybe it could be developed from making
someone's hand warm to making him more
Hello group,
Dr. Francesco Celani is reporting and encouraging to share that he found
out that small amounts of liquid hydrocarbons such as Acetone can
provide significant improvements to anomalous heat generation in
gas-loaded LENR devices. No further details are available at the moment
[A message from Celani]
Dear Colleagues,
As anticipated, we have found significative increase of anomalous heat when
we ADDED small amounts (1-2cc) of liquid hydrocarbons to our cell, under
partial vacuum conditions.
* Hystorically, in gas system, (since 2010), apart H2O and D2O (obviously NOT
Well that is a pretty good result, Reload the page and recheck the top
image for me, I improved it.
Anyway, to your question, that particular one is based on an angle that I
discovered I was holding my fingers on.
I tried to work out what it was and it seemed that 360/14= 25.714 deg
worked best.
Ah. I see Akira beat me to it.
Let me add a footnote:
Bockris and others warned me that carbon poisons the reaction. But I think
this is because they are using electrochemistry and carbon prevents
loading. That is a different problem.
- Jed
This is surprising. See:
http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/Wind-Overtakes-Nuclear-to-Become-Chinas-3rd-Largest-Energy-Source.html
QUOTE:
In 2012 wind power generation totalled 100.4 billion kilowatt hours, an
increase of 0.5% from the years before, and enough to send it past
Robin,
Nice analogy of HUP [snip] ...yes but as I said before, the enforcers from
the Bank of Heisenberg are
real thugs (baseball bats are standard issue. ;)[/snip].. and I will apply it
to ZPE and what these thugs do when the geometry confinement tries to curtail
the random direction of their
-Original Message-
From: Ron Clark
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/04/nasa-released-a-magica
l-timelapse-of-3-years-of-solar-beauty-and-we-set-it-to-dubstep-for-you/2752
29/
Interesting video with implications worthy of comment, even if this is only
an inverse kind of
I quoted:
CWEA states that in 2012 around 20 billion kWh of wind generated
electricity was wasted due to curtailment.
What a shame to waste all that electricity!
Question: How do you get rid of 20 billion kWh? With gigantic resistance
heaters?
Maybe they mean they feathered the turbine
I didn't feel anything from the new top image with a brief test.
Regardless of whether there's anything to this or not, it seems like a good
metaphor the feelings of most scientists
towards LENR ( or any other new paradigm ). Most know there's nothing to
it, so won't even bother to
The electroweak force can support the gainful nature of LENR just as well
as the strong force.
Beta decay can provide up to 6.5 MeV of LENR energy outputs which is about
on the same level as what the strong force can produce.
The Higgs field is a weak force mechanism and the thrust of new
The addition of carbon based material in a gas based LENR system may well
be due to the increase in the dielectric property of the gas provided by
the addition of the hydrocarbon.
Dielectric Constant of some common Liquids
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/liquid-dielectric-constants-d_1263.html
Here is a composite image showing a putative equatorial cold belt in a
static image.
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/assets_c/2013/04/743348m
ain_Timelapse_Sun_4k-1500-thumb-570x570-119711.jpg
If this banding effect were merely an illusion based the earth's changing
axis
Methanol has a very high dielectric constant at 32.6.This is compared to
1.26 for hydrogen.
Pressure an temperature of the Methanol will increase the dielectric
constant of the material.
At 32 °C, *ε*(1 bar)= 31.9 and *ε*(2000 bar)= 36.4. At 252 °C
This dielectric constant correlation is
Questions within Questions The Scientific 'Quest' for Definitive-Answers;that
'work.'
* * * CSETI: TORSION WAVE hyperspeed Communication was 'discovered'
by Joachim Hauser(Deutschland:contemporary) and moves through
parallel-adjacent SOURCE Aexohyperspace at VIRTUAL NO TIME-VIRTUAL
NO
The following presentation from India describes (what appears to be) a
successful sonofusion experiment.
The essential apparatus involved are:
- Pyrex flask.
- Deuterated acetone
- Vacuum pump.
- Piezoelectric crystal.
- Wave generator.
- Amplifier.
- Neutron generator.
- Neutron and gamma ray
I forgot to include the text description link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/137767342/Sonfusion
The following presentation from India describes (what appears to be) a
successful sonofusion experiment.
The essential apparatus involved are:
- Pyrex flask.
- Deuterated acetone
- Vacuum pump.
That is interesting, since you felt the other one.
So maybe the one designed to be more 'material' rather than just stronger
is just that.
Anyway while it is self serving to agree so fully with your correlation,
you are very correct.
That many can see it in one area and not in another is a
Scientific Question: ?How does 'Planned Eugenic Infanticide' translate into
Planned Parenthood? The NAZIs coined MANY dark euphamisms for 'human
extermination' amongwhich 'Eugenics' was adopted by them although it was NOT
'imagined' first by them. The Rockefeller Foundation was the NAZI
What is good in having more and more children, in particular when people
cannot afford it? I rather extend the length and quality of the people that
are already alive right now.
Giovanni
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Harbach Jak ja.harc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Scientific Question: ?How does
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 24 Apr 2013 03:47:59 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I went through the binding energy calculation for
Ni62 - Cu62 - 5.2703255625 MeV energy gain
Then you must have made a mistake somewhere. Cu62 naturally undergoes a weak
force decay reaction to Ni62, with the
This is interesting - especially in that it validates Rusi Taleyarkhan
claims.
Shame on you Purdue !
OTOH as of now - the device is grossly inefficient and the mention of having
a route to self-power is ridiculous. It would take at least 10,000 linked
reactors like this one to get near
My take is that these cold bands are sunspot bands which are colder than
their surroundings. They also rotate like hurricanes on earth, which are
also condensing water vapor around them through vacuum condensing. They
are both created by black hole strings of dark energy and the sun shares
these
We just shouldn't grant machines the decision about who lives or dies
Noel Sharkey, Chairman of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/03/opinion/killer-robots-new-arms-race/
http://icrac.net/
Harry
On 04/24/2013 07:26 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
We just shouldn't grant machines the decision about who lives or dies
Noel Sharkey, Chairman of the International Committee for Robot Arms Control.
I, for one, welcome our new robot masters...
No mistake, but check me
so..for 1 nickel 62...
Δmass = 28x1.00727647amu + 34x1.00866492amu - 61.928345amu = 0.5700034
so..for 1 copper 62...
Δmass = 29x1.00727647amu + 33x1.00866492amu - 61.932616amu = 0.5643440
Difference in binding energy = 0.00565941amu
In MeV = 5.2703255625
On
Yes, there must be a mistake because where does all that increased nuclear
binding energy come from?
The b-decay is going up an energy hill. The Bank of Heisenberg is going to
need an audit. I don’t understand it.
Please explain my mistake to me.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 7:51 PM,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 5:45 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:28:00 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
If a neutron can be made decay while in a deuteron then it seems to me
the warming of the lattice is best explained
by the motion arising from the
In stars deuterons formation begins with the fusion of two protons
into a diproton.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction
Since the diproton is very unstable it usually fissions soon after by
emitting a positron and a neutrino.
Darn, I forgot to correct that.
I disagree with this author. I think antonymous robots are better than
artillery, or WWII style bombs dropped from airplanes, or shooting arrows
at a crowd of people in ancient times.
Nobody likes to think about war. New weapons always seem especially cruel.
Some are, such as gas or nuclear
I, for one, welcome our new robot masters...
I am pretty sure they will watch the Simpsons, then kill you because you
got the quote wrong, imperfection found, eliminate faulty human.
I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.
Harry
In stars deuterons formation begins with the fusion of two protons
into a diproton.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction
Since the diproton is very unstable it usually fissions soon after by
emitting a positron and a neutrino.
This is not accurate. The
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Harry
In stars deuterons formation begins with the fusion of two protons
into a diproton.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction
Since the diproton is very unstable it usually fissions soon
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In RPF, Reversible Proton Fusion - the two protons which are immediately
split from nascent He-2 are technically not the original two protons
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:51:00 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
No mistake, but check me
so..for 1 nickel 62...
?mass = 28x1.00727647amu + 34x1.00866492amu - 61.928345amu = 0.5700034
You are adding the masses of naked protons and neutrons, but subtracting the
mass of the
Actually The neutron has mass slightly larger than that of a proton:
939.565378 MeV compared to 938.272046 MeV. Consequently, a deuteron has
slightly more mass than a diproton.
That is one of the many reasons why the reaction on the Sun, the one that
results in a deuteron is extraordinarily
Jones,
If the experimental outputs were properly measured, I am not as
pessimistic as you are. Maybe the neutron generator could be removed in a
self-sustained mode, for example. Also, the tritium could be used in an
after-burn fusion reactor. Bubble formation might be increased with
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:07:24 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Actually The neutron has mass slightly larger than that of a proton:
939.565378 MeV compared to 938.272046 MeV. Consequently, a deuteron has
slightly more mass than a diproton.
That is one of the many reasons why
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:07 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:07:24 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Actually The neutron has mass slightly larger than that of a proton:
939.565378 MeV compared to 938.272046 MeV. Consequently, a deuteron has
slightly
42 matches
Mail list logo
