My blog associate Georgina has sent now this instructive paper re solar
Energy.
I hope man-made Ni-H based new energy will avoid wisely the problems of
mis-development.
Solar Dreams, Spanish Realities
http://self-reliance-news.com/peak%20oil/energybulletinnet/456050-solar-dreams-spanish-realities
From: Terry Blanton
If - in fact it turns out that Rossi is using this particular nickel
isotope, and from the Kurchatov source, there is a good chance the above
scenario is a fairly accurate portrayal of what is happening.
Any comment on the net energy balance?
Terry - In a naïve
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Whereas Hagelstein’s model, when all is said and done, is an invention
created to match an experimental outcome (which it does) but with no
precedent in physical reality.
I think such models are called phenomenological
On May 5, 2013, at 11:52 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
wrote:
Whereas Hagelstein’s model, when all is said and done, is an
invention created to match an experimental outcome (which it does)
but with no precedent in physical reality.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
The very small number of alpha and neutrons can be explained without
assuming CF is the cause.
I guess this is the conclusion I'm trying to better understand -- I
understand the part about neutrons. It is the very
http://io9.com/5499139/an-interview-with-peter-hagelstein
An Interview With Peter
Hagelsteinhttp://io9.com/5499139/an-interview-with-peter-hagelstein
MIT Prof. Peter L. Hagelstein stated in an interview as follows:
So after a lot of years of work on it, about 10 years ago we found a model
Thank you, Spock.
Eric
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://io9.com/5499139/an-interview-with-peter-hagelstein
An Interview With Peter
Hagelsteinhttp://io9.com/5499139/an-interview-with-peter-hagelstein
MIT Prof. Peter L. Hagelstein stated in an
Eric, I assume that a single mechanism causes CF. This mechanism does
not produce energetic particles because if it did, they or their
secondaries would be easily detectable when multiple watts are
produced, as occasionally happens. Therefore, I reject any energetic
emission as being
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Eric, I assume that a single mechanism causes CF.
I am probably missing something important, but I don't see how the
statement below follows from the one above -- perhaps you are just
mentioning it and do not intend it
Ed Storms states:
In other words, the cracks make CF when they grow only to a small gap, but
can cause fractofusion if they grow large rapidly.
Axil begins:
In regard to experimental observation of crack dynamics as follows:
This is probably just a coincidence, but Ni-63 is used in krytons to make
avalanche electrical breakdowns more predictable. See:
Electric discharge in gases
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_discharge_in_gases
Krytron
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krytron
Lots of reported LENR results appear
On May 5, 2013, at 1:33 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Eric, I assume that a single mechanism causes CF.
I am probably missing something important, but I don't see how the
statement below follows from the one above --
The evanescent wave
As experimentally demonstrated, there is an EMF power amplification factor
of up to 10 to the 15 power demonstrated by nanolenzes formed by nanowires
and nanoparticles. What EMF amplification that the Ni/H reactors produce is
undoubtedly higher.
The question is “how does such
Thank you. I now have a better understanding the logic that has led you to
the slow-helium formation assumption.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
The CR-39 measurements were not made when calorimetry was done. Therefore,
we do not know if the alpha
If this theory from Ed Storms is to be considered universally applicable,
experimental results from DGT cannot be ignored.
DGT has published their ash assays from their reaction test. They see both
fission and fusion reactions in these results. IMHO, the primary causation
of these LENR reactions
On May 5, 2013, at 3:52 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
Thank you. I now have a better understanding the logic that has led
you to the slow-helium formation assumption.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
The CR-39 measurements were not made when
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
If this theory from Ed Storms is to be considered universally applicable,
experimental results from DGT cannot be ignored.
These results have to be published in detail and then independently
replicated before we can have confidence they are real. There are
I recently posted to Ed Storms this opinion of LENR experimentation which
show results consistent with what DGT is seeing.
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/isotope-table-lenr-tool/
Several medium and heavy elements like calcium, titanium, chromium,
manganese, iron, cobalt, copper and
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B6id5Hf-xMWOYXVjekJCN1ZkQk0/edit?pli=1
Results from Piantelli
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently posted to Ed Storms this opinion of LENR experimentation which
show results consistent with what DGT is seeing.
another one
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/1996/1996Mizuno-IsotopicDistribution-ICCF6.pdf
ISOTOPIC DISTRIBUTION FOR THE ELEMENTS EVOLYED IN PALLADIUM CATHODE AFTER
ELECTROLYSIS IN D2O SOLUTION
T. Mizuno, 'T.Ohmori*, T.Akimoto, K.Kurokawa, M.Kitaichi,
K.1noda, K.Azumi, S.Simokawa and M.
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Eric, you need to do some calculations. The CR-39 is an accumulator. The
flux, which determines power , is very small during these studies even
though the final result looks large. At no time could heat be detected
Axil,
If LENR is real, then certainly some energy concentration is occuring via
some unexpected pathway. Fano resonance looks promising.
If the modelling is too sophisticated, few (if any) will even try to
understand it.
We need a very simple model that is not too esoteric and intimidating
--
Is anyone still having any of ther vortex postings bounce, with
spamassassin warnings?Should be working OK currently.
(( ( ( ( ((O)) ) ) ) )))
William J. BeatySCIENCE HOBBYIST website
billb at amasci com
On Sun, 5 May 2013, William Beaty wrote:
Is anyone still having any of ther vortex postings bounce, with
spamassassin warnings?Should be working OK currently.
DOH! Contact me at beat...@gmail.com (since amasci/eskimo would in
theory bounce.)
(( ( ( ( ((O)
24 matches
Mail list logo
