Dear Friends,
This could be interpreted as pernicious lack of creativity and modesty, but
I cannot imagine better and more useful Sunday LENR lecture
than what I am offering you here:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/12/daily-shared-lenr-activity-december-21.html
It is also good against
I first met Jed at the CETI demo. It was nice to really meet him in person.
-Original Message-
From: Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Dec 20, 2014 11:43 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:1995- CETI 1kW reacto claim . fraud or not?
Perhaps
Blaze Spinnaker blazespinna...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps Patterson realized he didn't have anything which is why he
blustered instead of accepting a deal that would only lead to
disappointment.
There is not the slightest evidence for that, and absolutely no motivation
or method by which he
Frank Znidarsic fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
I first met Jed at the CETI demo. It was nice to really meet him in person.
Huh. When you consider that I was hopping mad and fit to be tied, the fact
that I was nice to meet is a credit to my self control, or at least, to
my ability to practice
In the private demo, which Jed was excluded, because they were mad at him, I
noted the preheater. I multiplied the frequency of the thermal vibrations
times the domain size and got 1 million meters per second.
The constant, Znidarsic's constant, 1,094,000 meters per second. It is the
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2014/12/15/frequent-flyers-could-take-a-hit-of-radiation-from-lightning/
John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
Huge issues regarding weight gain are probiotics, these can be responsible
for obesity or weight loss.
Many experiments with mice have proven this out.
The most effective way to make mice and other mammals fat is to feed them
cooked food, instead of
From: Blaze Spinnaker
Ø
Ø Perhaps Patterson realized he didn't have anything which is why he blustered
instead of accepting a deal that would only lead to disappointment.
Sadly, this will be the way that history and mainstream physics will remember
CETI unless the excess energy from
The very slow timeline and we are still not even close.
1996 observed the 1 million meters per second velocity in the CETI cell.
2000 ANS 200 meeting presented my theorem. The constants of the motion
converge in a Bose condensate stimulated at a dimensional frequency of 1 mega
hertz
I think this was excellent. Thanks Peter.
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648
“Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment
to excellence, intelligent planning,
I thank you for the kind words.
LENR technologists from all countries unite!
I just found a possible parallel between the secret
of LENR and the story Sacred Flame by Selma Lagerlof.
Do you remember it? Who will carry the flame further?
I read it some 65 years ago.
Peter
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014
I observed the velocity of one million meters per second at the CETI demo. I
felt that it was important. At first, as an Electrical Engineer, I produced
this velocity in terms of electrical units. I had a quantum of capacitance and
units of inductance. After taking some physics
- Original Message -
From: Frank Znidarsic
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:1995- CETI 1kW reacto claim . fraud or not?
I observed the velocity of one million meters per second at the CETI demo. I
felt that it was
Frank--
Those numbers are impressive. Does the maximum range of the strong nuclear
force match the idea of a sonic velocity of the nucleus very well? It so it
seems from a classical point of view one may be able to calculate the change in
the strong nuclear force as a function of distance
Hello Peter,
I agree to the extent it is hard to prove what you only know in your heart
or are the only one who has witnessed.
Glad you have read her books. .
She was an unusual woman and a great story teller.
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1
Lennart and Peter--
You are both optimists of the first order. Bravo. First order optimists are
generally liberal and look fear in the face and call it for what it is.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Lennart Thornros
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014
Jones--
I agree with your reconsideration of Pahlavani's letter. A little tutorial on
the Nature of Woods-Saxon potential is warranted:
From Wikipedia--
The Woods–Saxon potential is a mean field potential for the nucleons (protons
and neutrons) inside the atomic nucleus, which is used to
Dear Bob,
I have very clearly stated that I am optimist onle for the future of LENR
but sadly pessimist re its present.
Call me false prophet of 3rd rank if after 5 years LENR based energy
sources will not be on the market- just under a new name.
Peter
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Bob Cook
Sorry Frank, but you are just as wrong now as you were then.
http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?rp|search_for=proton+radius
- Original Message -
From: Frank Znidarsic mailto:fznidar...@aol.com
There were those that stated that my analysis was wrong
I was hoping that science would accept LENR in my lifetime so that science
could help me understand what LENR was really all about.
But orthodox science and LENR are antagonistic at a fundamental level. The
divide here is just too great. If LENR produces transmutation, fusion, and
reduces and
Jones--
I think the item I just copied regarding the Woods-Saxon potential indicates
for Hydrogen, Z=1, that Frank is closer to the listed radius of 1.23 fm than
you are at your .866 fm. I think your radius is a rms charge radius. You
and Frank may be talking about different dimensions of
Bob, there is only one physical radius for the proton, the charge radius.
Frank’s value is way off since he has always confused Compton wavelength with a
physical dimension. Sure, we can recognize duality here, but if you want
something to be based on a “speed” or quantum velocity less than
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 11 Dec 2014 22:52:18 -0500:
Hi,
BTW for a Hydrino based explanation, consider the possibility that 4 negatively
charged Hydrinohydride ions displace the electrons of a Lithium atom and arrange
themselves in a tight tetrahedron with Li3+ at its core. This
Jones you are wrong now as you were before. I am speaking about the radius of
the bound nucleon which is half of the nuclear wave number.
1.35/2
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Dec 21, 2014 4:22 pm
Subject: RE:
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Dec 21, 2014 1:39 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:1995- CETI 1kW reacto claim . fraud or not?
Frank--
Those numbers are impressive.
thanks Bob
Does the maximum range of the strong
Frank,
“Bound nucleon”… this is the new twist to megahertz-meter? Which bound nucleon?
Isn’t it fair to ask: what good is a theory for LENR which does not apply to
either hydrogen or deuterium?
The radius of the deuteron which is a bound nucleon is 2.14 fm … hydrogen is
.8775 fm.
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Does the maximum range of the strong nuclear force match the idea of a
sonic velocity of the nucleus very well?
I believe nuclear phonons are entirely quantum. In this regard I wonder
whether there's a sense in which
No it does not. Nuclear courses start off with the liquid drop model of the
nucleus. They then process forever in the direction of increasingly harder
mathematics. Liquids convey sound. Ask a post doc about the speed of sound
in the liquid drop and you will get the blank stare of an
Philosopher Joseph Agassi's 1986 paper _The Politics of Science_.
http://www.academia.edu/3705830/politics_of_science
quotes:
...It is an empirical fact that when I report to colleagues, philosophers,
scientists, university professors and administrators, and other
intellectuals, that I wish to
29 matches
Mail list logo
