Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

I read the text but I didn't watch the video (hate videos for information transfer), so maybe this is answered there -- but are we really sure this is supposed to communicate with /endpoints/ (cell phones, desktops, whatever)? Technologically, it would be far easier -- and still useful -- if

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

Ah, here we are: "With Aquila, we've designed a new aircraft architecture, one that can support staying in the air for months at a time. Aquila is solar powered, and when launched, it will create a 50-km communications radius for up to 90 days, beaming a signal down to the people in that area.

Re: [Vo]:The Seventh Segment Signal

The radiation extends above 0.511 MeV in Trace #7 and this doesn't seem to fit with Hirsch's Theory (i.e., Hole Superconductivity as described in DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/19/12/125217 ). Perhaps if the electrons were heavy (dressed) it could be valid. I would need to take a closer look. Also,

[Vo]:the Apgar score of the newborn IH Counterclaims document (i)

still waiting for the birth, to be continued (the blog) tomorrow http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/08/aug-5-2016-lenr-war-apgar-score-of.html all my best wishes , Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:Fwd: wow

-Original Message- From: Robert Vargo To: Frank Znidarsic Sent: Fri, Aug 5, 2016 10:52 am Subject: wow Elon Musk: Tesla’s Model 3 factory could look like an alien warship - The Washington Post

[Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

Solar airplanes have been a useless tour de force up until now. This one is intended to provide internet service to parts of the world that do not have it, such as Africa. This airplane will fly for months. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOez_Hk80TI

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

There are some parts I really don't understand. From the text article, " the plan is to create a drone system that acts as /*floating wifi routers*/ to bridge the internet gaps on the ground" Wifi routers, 15 /miles/ up in the sky? What kind of wifi card do you need in your system to throw

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > I'm also pretty amazed at the concept of solar powering the things. If > they really draw 5 kw (as per the last paragraph), well, that's impressive > on the one hand (7 horsepower or thereabouts is not much for

[Vo]:How to blow $3.5 billion

How to blow at least $3.5 billion on nuclear fusion and get far less gain that Holmlid's laser experiment costing 10,000 times less. One picture says it all . another Big Fizzix fail. http://www.wired.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Lasers2-932x699.jpg Worst of all, LLNL will not attempt to

RE: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

Communications costs are already an order of magnitude lower than those in the USA in many countries of the world, without any strange new technology. The cost of modern cellular communications in high priced nations is proven to be purely a factor of capitalist greed, it has nothing to do with

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

Thanks -- that makes sense. On 08/05/2016 02:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Ah, here we are: "With Aquila, we've designed a new aircraft architecture, one that can support staying in the air for months at a time. Aquila is solar powered, and when launched, it will create a 50-km communications

Re: [Vo]:the Apgar score of the newborn IH Counterclaims document (i)

You seem to forget that Rossi started this fight. If Rossi had not filed the lawsuit, there would be no dispute. I.H. was willing to ignore him and write off the $11 million. I do not think they were planning to sue him. Granted, they were planning to publish the ERV report eventually. Once they

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

What's your point, Russ? Stringing fibre costs a bunch. This is supposed to reach areas where that hasn't been done and where the funds to do it don't exist. As such, it solves a real problem which really exists; it's not just some conspiracy dreamed up by the capitalists. The alternative

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

On 08/05/2016 05:21 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: No more stationary than a satellite. As far as I know, fixed-position satellite dishes work just fine. Get the altitude about right, get the azimuth sort of in the right direction, and the reflector produces some gain, which is what you

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

MJ wrote: > "small towers and dishes" ? Will the plane be stationary? > Somewhat. Within a narrow range. Maybe not as much as a geosynchronous satellite. I do not think their fancy 10 Gbps lasers are intended to communicate with normal ground installations, but I

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

Russ George wrote: Communications costs are already an order of magnitude lower than those in > the USA in many countries of the world, without any strange new technology. > Okay, so this will be 2 orders of magnitude cheaper than the U.S. Internet service in Japan seems

Re: [Vo]:How to blow $3.5 billion

They are not blowing money. The aim of that is testing the implosion of the core of nuclear weapons. There are many restrictions for testing and improvement of USA stockpile. That is a way to get around that. 2016-08-05 10:43 GMT-03:00 Jones Beene : > How to blow at least

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

"small towers and dishes" ? Will the plane be stationary? Mark Jordan On 05-Aug-16 17:28, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: Thanks -- that makes sense. On 08/05/2016 02:26 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Ah, here we are: "With Aquila, we've designed a new aircraft architecture, one that can

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

No more stationary than a satellite. As far as I know, fixed-position satellite dishes work just fine. Get the altitude about right, get the azimuth sort of in the right direction, and the reflector produces some gain, which is what you need. The signal's strong enough that you don't need a

RE: [Vo]:The Seventh Segment Signal

It may be worth noting that “hole superconductivity” may end up being broader than Hirsch’s theory. For instance, Hirsch mentions “ring current” several times in his many papers, which is somewhat of a middle ground between electron and hole superconductivity. In fact, he tries to explain

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: I suppose it's not actually WIFI . . . > I think it is cell phone technology, not WiFi. Cell phone towers use a lot of power, so I do not know how this will work. The aircraft will communicate with one-another and with ground stations using lasers.

Re: [Vo]:Facebook solar airplane

Eric Walker wrote: > In addition to technical considerations, there are two social > considerations: (1) it might be unnerving for some (most?) populations to > have a plane perpetually aloft that is owned by a private company that > could be carrying out reconnaissance