[Vo]:Current size of QuarkX

[Adrian Ashfield]

Andrea Rossi replied today that the current size is 10 mm by 5 mm dia with a 
rated output of 20 W.

As they would have to be grouped to get sufficient power for most purposes I 
wonder if they are now stable and similar enough that many  units can be 
powered by a single power controller.

AA

Re: [Vo]:Current size of QuarkX

[Brian Ahern]

I cannot resist commenting. The size of the quarkX is not important. It is the 
color and texture. I think lavender with a herringbone pattern is optimal.  
That will allow them to match the emperor's new outfits.



From: Adrian Ashfield 
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 10:17 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Current size of QuarkX

Andrea Rossi replied today that the current size is 10 mm by 5 mm dia with a 
rated output of 20 W.

As they would have to be grouped to get sufficient power for most purposes I 
wonder if they are now stable and similar enough that many  units can be 
powered by a single power controller.

AA

Re: [Vo]:Current size of QuarkX

[Adrian Ashfield]

Brian,
Your thoughts are well known and unproven.
AA

 

 

 

-Original Message-
From: Brian Ahern 
To: vortex-l 
Sent: Tue, May 23, 2017 11:50 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Current size of QuarkX



I cannot resist commenting. The size of the quarkX is not important. It is the 
color and texture. I think lavender with a herringbone pattern is optimal.  
That will allow them to match the emperor's new outfits.



From: Adrian Ashfield 
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 10:17 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Current size of QuarkX
 

Andrea Rossi replied today that the current size is 10 mm by 5 mm dia with a 
rated output of 20 W.

As they would have to be grouped to get sufficient power for most purposes I 
wonder if they are now stable and similar enough that many  units can be 
powered by a single power controller.

AA

RE: [Vo]:Missing Neutrons? In a neutron-rich tin nucleus, electromagnetism can win over the strong force

[bobcook39...@hotmail.com]

This report is another nail in Standard Model’s coffin.Folks should take a 
look at the theory of P Hatt to understand better what happens in the tin 
situation.

 Bill Stubb’s item in Infinite Energy last year evaluating high energy electron 
scattering experiments is also instructive in IMHO.

Bob Cook


From: Alan Fletcher
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2017 9:05 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Missing Neutrons? In a neutron-rich tin nucleus, electromagnetism 
can win over the strong force

Just wondering if this might be relevent to one of the Cold Fusion "miracles"

https://phys.org/news/2017-05-neutron-rich-tin-nucleus-electromagnetism-strong.html

In a recent experiment ... scientists .. made a very surprising observation: 
High-energy gamma rays—which are mediated by the electromagnetic force—are 
emitted in the decay of a certain excited nucleus—tin 133, in competition with 
neutron emission, the decay mode mediated by the strong nuclear force. This is 
despite the fact that the neutron emission was expected to be orders of 
magnitude faster since the force is much stronger.

...

The RIBF results suggest that structure effects, which are commonly neglected 
in the evaluation of neutron-emission probabilities in calculations of global 
beta-decay properties for astrophysical simulations, are much more important 
than generally assumed
...
--
Alan Fletcher