[Vo]:Question about Muon catalysed fusion

[Remi Cornwall]

I thought I’d forward a discussion with someone about Muon catalysed fusion.

 

Idea is that moderated cosmic ray muons (some 10,000/m^2/minute) might last 
longer in a lattice (the free electron gas would prevent decay, much like a 
neutron in a nucleus doesn’t decay because of the protons Pauli excluding the 
decay – it can’t decay because the states it wants to decay to are already 
filled). Also prevent muon capture by alpha particles (product of fusion). Stem 
these two processes – muon decay and capture and it might work.

 

Might it be possible to capture the cosmic muons, subject them to a magnetic 
field, whereupon they go around in circles bremstrahalunging a bit until they 
are slow enough to initiate CF in a LiD lattice (or maybe LI metal infused with 
deuterium rather than an ionic LiD lattice). The person I am corresponding with 
notes that heavy metal lattices preferentially capture muons, so I suggested a 
light metal lattice. I also suggested a magnetic field (+ve go one way, -ve 
another) or UV to break up muon capture by alpha particles. Compression may 
help fusion too – put the material in a diamond anvil.

 

If anyone is up for this, let me know.

 

From: Remi Cornwall [mailto:remic...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 12 July 2017 12:29
To: 
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Question about Muon catalysed fusion

 

Moderate them? If you capture them, subject them to a magnetic field, they will 
go in circles until their energy is such that it might allow reactions.

 

From: 
Sent: 12 July 2017 00:12
To: remic...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Question about Muon catalysed fusion

 

Cosmic muons are so energetic that they will never see the LiD lattice. These 
cosmic ultra fast muons will lose all that cosmic energy when they are two 
miles underground.

 

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Remi Cornwall wrote:

I see, then what about a lattice of LiD ? Incidentally, not talking about 
generating muons but using what is present from cosmic radiation at sea level.

From: 
Sent: 11 July 2017 23:55
To: remic...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Question about Muon catalysed fusion

Muon Physics  

http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/ugrad/389/muon/muonphysics.pdf

Total nucler caputure rates for negitive muons.

http://lartpc-docdb.fnal.gov/0002/000248/002/Suzuki_etal.pdf

The muon capture rate goes up as the atom's nuclear size goes up. uranium has a 
capture rate 1,000,000 times greater than hydrogen.

B) If the lattice is then either warm enough or bombarded with UV, magnetic
field (Hall effect) might this stop the muon capture?

light elements stop the capture of muons.

Most muon capture happens away from where the muon was created, possibly 
kilometers away. The amount of secondary muon catalyzed fusion that occurs in 
LENR is miniscule  local to the lattice that produced the muon.

The amount of muons that escape the lattice is very large unless the lattice is 
surrounded by a foot or two of lead.

 

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Remi Cornwall  wrote:

Dear Vo,

Sorry if this is off topic but I have a question about Muon catalysed
fusion.

If I understand correctly, basically two factors come into play a) Muon
decay and b) Muon capture by alpha particles from the fusion process. So I
thought this:-

A) A neutron on its own decays after about 15 minutes 1/2 life to a proton
and an electron (and electron neutrino and perhaps gamma). In the nucleus it
doesn't decay by the Pauli exclusion principle, which stops it dropping into
a non-empty proton state (it's surrounded by protons). So, might it be
possible to stop a muon decaying in a lattice somewhat because there is a
free electron gas?

B) If the lattice is then either warm enough or bombarded with UV, magnetic
field (Hall effect) might this stop the muon capture?

My two cents. Who can expand on this?

Regards,
Remi.

 

 

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

[AlanG]

Every experiment we run since 2013 has gamma spectrometry in place as 
well as a sensitive Geiger-Muller pancake detector and several neutron 
bubble detectors. All the spectral data and G-M counts are published in 
near real time and made permanently available for open viewing and 
analysis. Just follow the links I posted.


As a general rule, we try to avoid drawing conclusions from our data 
unless it is clearly unusual, and only then after extensive analysis and 
discussion by the Crowd. This includes you of course, and I encourage 
you to look at the gamma data from GS5.3 and GS5.4 which ran earlier 
this year. If you see anything that looks unusual or otherwise worth 
discussion, let us all know.


*AlanG / MFMP*

On 7/12/2017 4:44 AM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:
The issue is:What have you been doing with that gamma ray thing.  All 
the rest fits into what I called "whatever it is".


On Tuesday, July 11, 2017, AlanG > wrote:


On 7/11/2017 10:24 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote:

The gamma ray finding of MFMP was replicated within 48 hours by Hans
Biberian.   And then they just faded away onto whatever it is they've
been doing for 4 years.

Kevin, your comment suggests that you haven't been paying
attention or even bothering to search. Just this year, we
performed four serious experiments as a group and individually,
including an in-depth detailed field test of the me356 reactor.
Our goal is the practice of Live Open Science, and nothing is
hidden, no matter what we find.

My current research in Ni-Ag (Live Doc - watch for updates) can be
seen at https://goo.gl/rTDz87

Below is a partial list of links to our previous work over the
past five years, in roughly chronological order.
*
**AlanG / MFMP*

Dogbone->Glowstick genesis
&
Glowstick Sealing Evernote (AG)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bz7lTfqkED9WYUhFZDJhNjRVTm8/view


Ni Etching Evernote
http://www.evernote.com/l/AXeIG29QrzhC3KVjl9Qf9aJsigzQ671dDG0/


Dogbone Evernote (Ryan Hunt)

https://www.evernote.com/pub/marpooties/projectdogbone#st=p=ca649d5c-7e11-47e8-9299-a0483fb38972



Higgins_Dogbone_drawings
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B0yO8n6-0MjNakxTNW9xbHBFaEU


Higgins Spec7 (GS5.2)  Analysis http://goo.gl/DOiXYe

QuantumHeat Dogbone blog
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/experiements/active-experiments/pdb



Dogbone Live Doc

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1F12E3BEtjr8PTm7-t-uWDF0OSNrdO9biuD5GJWoHWhE/


or
goo.gl/JzCLRg 

Dogbone Analysis - Excess Heat calc. http://goo.gl/0rP40x   (Higgins)

Dogbone Analysis paper (Higgins)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Pc25a4cOM2TWU5Vk80VkxwYVU/view


Core Heater notes (w/coil shadow)

https://www.evernote.com/pub/alang152/dogbonecoreheater#st=p=313ebf33-5c4b-49e5-94a6-05f983b2eed6


or
goo.gl/4YLDgM 

GS2 data archive

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxxJkjesxe4kfktqTHMxQ0Vxb3M0N0tVZDVPNHQtWGhOeXN4SUJ3TUdmYlhsTkE3eFoxUFk


or
goo.gl/db2Ogl 

GS3 data archive

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxxJkjesxe4kfm9pVEhvU3RKNzR6ZEcxUktYYThPRXBHZHBPOFBCV1RiMzdmbU45RW13cm8


or
goo.gl/MyX0Jh 

GS4 data archive

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxxJkjesxe4kfnczTEJoV1RnQnphNTFQVUhUc29LQTlqOGxpamVfbDBxT3gwa01OdUI4Z28


or
goo.gl/o4z9bE 

GS5.2 Live Doc
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/home/mfmp-blog/515-glowstick-5-2

or
http://goo.gl/z5aoBY

GS5.3 data archive
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxxJkjesxe4kSzg4YXVwNHNpTEk

or
goo.gl/QUhKJb 

Re: [Vo]:MFMP activities

[Jed Rothwell]

AlanG  wrote:

Every experiment we run since 2013 has gamma spectrometry in place as well
> as a sensitive Geiger-Muller pancake detector and several neutron bubble
> detectors.
>

Good! This sounds like a good approach. Using multiple instruments should
make a positive result convincing, especially if more than one type
registers the signal during the event.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

[Che]

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Che  wrote:
>
>
>> Who sneered? Who are "they"?
>>>
>>> - Jed
>>>
>>>
>> What? You calling me a liar?
>>
>
> Okay, have it your way: you're a liar. Now tell us who sneered.
>


Nyah, nyah, nyhah, petit-bourgeois swell-head engineer.

Pfft.

On to the science, OK? I see the MFMP has responded to someone who has
apparently sneered at them(??!!)

And for the record: the one who sneers does NOT actually usually USE the
word 'sneer'.
Boy. Some people.








>
>
>> Go read the thread.
>>
>
> I don't see it.
>
> - Jed
>
>

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

[Jed Rothwell]

Che  wrote:


> What? You calling me a liar?
>>>
>>
>> Okay, have it your way: you're a liar. Now tell us who sneered.
>>
>
>
> Nyah, nyah, nyhah, petit-bourgeois swell-head engineer.
>

Hey, you asked me to call you that! Make up your mind.



> And for the record: the one who sneers does NOT actually usually USE the
> word 'sneer'.
>

Too meta for me. For the record: When the barber shaves those who do not
shave themselves, does he shave himself?

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

[Che]

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 7:46 PM, ROGER ANDERTON 
wrote:
>
> 5 Jul at 5:50 PM  said :   So much drama for nothing...
>
>
> does that count as sneering?


No, actually. In this sense here, it is sneering when it is in fact
_unwarranted_, and _gratuitously_ dismissive. However, there are situations
where sneering is in fact 'warranted'... but in that case, such a response
to others' misfortune is considered highly 'not cricket' (i.e. in bad
taste).

Sneering is never constructive. Why they invented the word, OK?

Sheesh. You can take them off the Farm...

Re: [Vo]:Rossi versus Darden trial settled

[Che]

You want the last word? Make another useless email reply.

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> Che  wrote:
>
>
>> What? You calling me a liar?

>>>
>>> Okay, have it your way: you're a liar. Now tell us who sneered.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Nyah, nyah, nyhah, petit-bourgeois swell-head engineer.
>>
>
> Hey, you asked me to call you that! Make up your mind.
>
>
>
>> And for the record: the one who sneers does NOT actually usually USE the
>> word 'sneer'.
>>
>
> Too meta for me. For the record: When the barber shaves those who do not
> shave themselves, does he shave himself?
>
> - Jed
>
>

[Vo]:Allais Effect

[Terry Blanton]

In August you will have a chance to prove the aether exists.

http://www.allais.info/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allais_effect

Re: [Vo]:Allais Effect

[ROGER ANDERTON]

Boscovich aether was never disproved.

Unified field theory from the classical wave equation: Preliminary application 
to atomic and nuclear structure 
  Héctor A. Múnera1,2, a)
AIP Conference Proceedings 1753, 030015 (2016); doi: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4955356
AbstractIt is postulated that there exists a fundamental energy-like fluid, 
which occupies the flat three-dimensional Euclidean space that contains our 
universe, and obeys the two basic laws of classical physics: conservation of 
linear momentum, and conservation of total energy; the fluid is described by 
the classical wave equation (CWE), which was Schrödinger’s first candidate to 
develop his quantum theory. Novel solutions for the CWE discovered twenty years 
ago are nonharmonic, inherently quantized, and universal in the sense of scale 
invariance, thus leading to quantization at all scales of the universe, from 
galactic clusters to the sub-quark world, and yielding a unified 
Lorentz-invariant quantum theory ab initio. Quingal solutions are isomorphic 
under both neo-Galilean and Lorentz transformations, and exhibit nother 
remarkable property: intrinsic unstability for large values of ℓ (a quantum 
number), thus limiting the size of each system at a given scale. Unstability 
and scale-invariance together lead to nested structures observed in our solar 
system; unstability may explain the small number of rows in the chemical 
periodic table, and nuclear unstability of nuclides beyond lead and bismuth. 
Quingal functions lend mathematical basis for Boscovich’s unified force (which 
is compatible with many pieces of evidence collected over the past century), 
and also yield a simple geometrical solution for the classical three-body 
problem, which is a useful model for electronic orbits in simple diatomic 
molecules. A testable prediction for the helicoidal-type force is 
suggested.Unified field theory from the classical wave equation: Preliminary 
application to atomic and nuclear structure: AIP Conference Proceedings: Vol 
1753, No 1

  
|  
|   |  
Unified field theory from the classical wave equation: Preliminary application 
to atomic and nuclear structure: AIP C...
 By Héctor A. Múnera   |  |

  |

 
 
Ruggiero Boscovich - Rudjer Boskovic (1711-1787) has a memorial plaque in Milano

  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
|   |  
Ruggiero Boscovich - Rudjer Boskovic (1711-1787) has a memorial plaque in M...
 Ruggero Boscovich - Boskovic has a memorial plaque in Milano  |   |

  |

  |

 






On Thursday, 13 July 2017, 0:15, Terry Blanton  wrote:
 

 In August you will have a chance to prove the aether exists.
http://www.allais.info/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allais_effect