Re: [Vo]:GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread AlanG
A week ago I wrote this to Kevin O'Malley off-list, regarding his mention of MFMP: "/MFMP always welcomes donations and we have a 501c3 which could make such contributions tax-deductible in the US. I already have a Gamma Spectrometer system thanks to past contributions, but the equipment

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: Plus, if I understand correctly, he is asking for $100,000. > Yup. That's what it says. That's chutzpah! It also says: "The offer to test for gammas was rescinded. Please donate instead to the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project. I don't understand why this page is still there.

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
Kevin O'Malley wrote: Uhh, Jed I proposed explicitly that YOU would be more suited to go > and test but you declined. Okay, you proposed I go. I told you I know nothing about this. Why are you repeating this? You have "explicitly proposed" that the wrong person be sent to do something he

RE: [Vo]:Article on Dennis Danzik - Inventor of EarthEngine (magmo)

2019-05-18 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Scale up is frequently a bad idea IMHO Take fission nuclear power business (a model for fusion nuclear power business. ) CONS: * It takes a long time to manufacture big reactor equipment and complex systems on-site away from labor forces. * Up front costs are high and returns on

Re: [Vo]:GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Kevin O'Malley
"The offer to test for gammas was rescinded. Please donate instead to the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project." I don't understand why this page is still there. ***Because it all falls within my original intention, which is to bell the cat. If in the future I decide to make MFMP a beneficiary of

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Kevin O'Malley
It says right on the GoFundMe page, and has said so for several days, that my invitation was rescinded. It is yet another stepstone of bullshit laid down for whomever it is that will bell the cat. Any money raised outside of this rescinded invitation will be sent to MFMP. If they choose to not

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Kevin O'Malley
No, it is not easy to see this. It is insane. The person who does this should not need any training or equipment. ***Such people aren't stepping forward. My proposal should be easy to underbid, instead we have ... more bullshit. You joking around. The simple fact is that whoever goes forward

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Kevin O'Malley
Uhh, Jed I proposed explicitly that YOU would be more suited to go and test but you declined. Alan S said that it would take $1000 for a gamma spectrometer, but he's off by 10X. Let's just apply that coefficient elsewhere, shall we? I think it'll take $5k to train me. Applying Allan's

Re: [Vo]:GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Kevin O'Malley
However, we have no idea who these experts are, what they saw, or what they said. So that doesn't count. We can't make anything of it. Of course S have every right to keep this secret, but I suggest we pay no attention to them until they go public and publish a professional paper. In my opinion,

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Kevin O'Malley
You either send a credible expert, or no one. ***You are credible. If Kromek gave you training on their gamma spectrometer, you'd be in the upper echelon of credible testers. Anyone who gets trained would be able to defend themselves and if not, Kromek is gonna look real bad. Simple. Someone

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Terry Blanton
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:48 PM Kevin O'Malley wrote: > I received a quote from Kromek, more than 10k Pounds (I don't have the > symbol for pounds nor euros) > For Pounds, press "alt+0163" = £ For Euro, press "alt+0128" = €

Re: [Vo]:GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Kevin O'Malley
Kevin has not replied to my message, and his intentions are unclear. *** My initial statements were in public rather than in private. To be candid, the paragraph you wrote to me privately right before this one you're quoting , well that paragraph kinda sets the tone. And since it's done in

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
Kevin O'Malley wrote: > The simple fact is that whoever goes forward to test gammas and > actually finds them will probably find his career over. That's gotta > be worth $100k. And that's why no one is stepping forward to overcome > the ... bullshit. > I doubt that the career would be over,

Re: [Vo]:GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
Kevin O'Malley wrote: > Jed is > already posted in as willing to do it for a cool $million. That > makes me look cheap in comparison. > That was a JOKE. > Of course I think Someone ELSE should bell the > cat, like Jed Rothwell whom I posted as a good candidate, since he's > tested cold

Re: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
wrote: > His GofundMe campaign seems to be predicated on his raising money based on > his coming to the lab to view my work. I repeat he is NOT invited. That > puts all his messaging into the realm of worse than bullshit, as when one > is raising money on false pretenses there is a different

Re: [Vo]:A step further towards understanding the Holmlid effect?

2019-05-18 Thread Jürg Wyttenbach
Inside dense matter photons can run on SO(4) orbits as the most recent experiment with group speed >>>c did show. This implies that they must couple to the central flux of magnetic mass. In Holmlids  case with a coherent laser the SO(4) orbits get "overloaded" what means that the release of

RE: [Vo]:Re: GoFundMe: Geiger Counter + Lab Tour to Test Atom-Ecology Claimed Energy Source

2019-05-18 Thread russ.george
Kevin O'Malley seems to be running under some sort of mental instability as he is definitely NOT invited to visit the Atom-Ecology/Ecalox lab. His GofundMe campaign seems to be predicated on his raising money based on his coming to the lab to view my work. I repeat he is NOT invited. That puts