Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

Platform, or Publisher? If Big Tech firms want to retain valuable government protections, then they need to get out of the censorship business. Adam CandeubMark Epstein May 7, 2018 https://www.city-journal.org/html/platform-or-publisher-15888.html quote <> Harry On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:56

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

Point is -> facebook is not Washington Post. It was a platform for people to communicate among themselves; now censorship is being increased. Facebook is more compatible to telephone conversations than to Washington Post. Would you agree to having telephone conversations censored? And as for

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: As for the other issue -> government admits to working in partnership with > big tech to censor --> > The government and big tech have every right to work together. > The Biden administration confirms it aggressively works with Big Tech “…to > flag ‘problematic’ posts

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

by then the lid gets put on the pot. No vote is needed.<< -> so no freedom of choice as for "legal" -> the rules just change to suit the dictator. For instance in Nazi Germany it was probably not legal to be anti-nazi. The government has been working with publishers for the benefit

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: more things have to pay for all adds up > Okay, so if the ads annoy you and you don't want to pay $12 a month, don't watch YouTube. No one is forcing you to watch it. I do not understand what you are complaining about.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

well as for covid pandemic -> most of the information that we are supposed to believe (for political propaganda reasons) comes from Fauci -> and he keeps getting caught out as lying "He Definitely Lied to Us And He Should Be Held Responsible" Dr. Paul Addresses New G.O.F. Emails

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

CB Sites wrote: Yeah, the monetization of youtube sucks. They do have to find a way to pay > for it so I just sit through a 30sec ad or two and skip the 2-15 minute > ones. But annoying as heck, I agree with. > It turns out you can get YouTube Premium for $12 a month. That eliminates the ads.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

H LV wrote: Platform, or Publisher? > If Big Tech firms want to retain valuable government protections, then > they need to get out of the censorship business. > If they are trying to shield themselves claiming "platform" rights under Code 230, that's unfair. I don't know what the story is. In

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: they hooked me > Poor you! Maybe there is some kind YouTube addiction withdrawal support network.

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

government and big tech working together is fascism -> the electorate didn't vote for that It would be censorship if the government forced you to remove documents it disagrees with.<< wel its all about boiling the frog, take small steps in increasing what the frog has to tolerate until

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: Then "they" can up the price. Point is -> used to be free; so tried to get > people hooked on something that was free and then fleece them. > $12 a month does not seem like fleecing to me. It is more than I would be willing to pay, but a lot less than cable TV, or YouTube

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

more things have to pay for all adds up -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:40 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads ROGER ANDERTON > wrote:

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

they hooked me -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 15:56 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads ROGER ANDERTON > wrote: more things have to pay for

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: It is not their constitutional right to censor. > It most certainly is their right! Facebook or the Washington Post cannot be forced to publish an editorial they disagree with. They can censor any opinion or letter they want. If the government were to force them to publish

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

Then "they" can up the price. Point is -> used to be free; so tried to get people hooked on something that was free and then fleece them. -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 14:50 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

wiki says -> YouTube is an American online video sharing and social media platform owned by Google . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube so is a

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

is that free? -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 16:10 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads ROGER ANDERTON > wrote: they hooked me Poor you!

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: government and big tech working together is fascism -> the electorate > didn't vote for that > No vote is needed. The government and big tech both have the right of free speech, and the right to do whatever they like as long as it is legal. The electorate cannot take away

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

I see they don't mention using deuterium, (heavy hydrogen,) and micro-cluster palladium as a source, which is the easiest and most cost effective. On Monday, September 20, 2021, 08:29:46 AM PDT, Jed Rothwell wrote: ROGER ANDERTON wrote: government and big tech working together is

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

I disagree, it is fascism when corporations and government are in partnership. -- Original Message -- From: "Jed Rothwell" To: "Vortex" Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 18:09 Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads ROGER ANDERTON

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > >>No vote is needed.<< -> so no freedom of choice > Absolutely no freedom of choice!! You are never allowed to interfere with my freedom of speech, or Facebook's, or the U.S. government's freedom of speech. The voters are not allowed to overrule the Constitution. The

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

Just så the Said in germany in the 1930is. Government can do as they want. The government wants our best. On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, 13:09 Jed Rothwell wrote: > ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > > >> >>No vote is needed.<< -> so no freedom of choice >> > > Absolutely no freedom of choice!! You are never

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

The Chinese people (Uigurs) love the peoples liberation army as the Germans (Jews) did love the Waffen SS and the Russian love omon... J.W. On 21.09.2021 00:52, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: their plan -> everyone will be poor except the billionairies -> You'll own nothing and you'll be happy |

Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without YouTube ads

their plan -> everyone will be poor except the billionairies -> You'll own nothing and you'll be happy | The Great Reset | Klaus Schwab https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IzwiH40JOc -- Original Message -- From: "Lennart Thornros" To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, 20 Sep, 21 At 23:19