Here is an obituary of Martin Fleischmann by D. Williams:
https://www.chemistryworld.com/opinion/martin-fleischmann-1927-2012/5401.article
Some of this is pleasing. It reminds me of what McKubre and others said
about Martin. Unfortunately, the parts about cold fusion are nonsense.
Either
>From a fabrication standpoint here is an even simpler test for cooling
radiation.
It consists of a truncated cone lined with reflective mylar on the
inside. The wide end is open to the sky and a thermometer is located
at the vertex of the cone.
See diagram:
Now that we have learned about all there is to learn about the acquisition and
preservation of dry ice, I think you're right about this test. The double
parabola test you initially proposed would not have proved or disproved cooling
radiation. The dry ice at the focus would have been a
I'm getting a 404 error on that link
Try this one
https://phys.org/news/2022-01-century-old-electrochemistry-law.html
On Monday, January 24, 2022, 02:00:55 PM PST, CB Sites
wrote:
Phys.org has a nice snippet on the Gouy-Chapman theory that describes how
charge is distributed in
Don't forget to give us the result of your experiment if you do it.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, January 24th, 2022 at 9:06 PM, MSF wrote:
> Now that we have learned about all there is to learn about the acquisition
> and preservation of dry ice, I think you're right about this
This article brought to mind the Stanley Meyer lore from many years ago. That
may sound like an odd connection. It is the double layer connection ,,,
Although deceased for several decades, Meyer was a contentious figure in so
called "water fuel" electrolysis, with a cult-like following even
Phys.org has a nice snippet on the Gouy-Chapman theory that describes how
charge is distributed in electrolysis, but now 40-50 years later they found
that the description isn't really correct. They found that the double layer
could be bigger or smaller than expected and it has dependencies on the
7 matches
Mail list logo
