I just got a notice from Walmart that shipping of Ed Storm's book
*The Science of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction* is delayed. If you read
it carefully though it says if it doesn't ship in 10 days they will
CANCEL YOUR ORDER if you don't contact them at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Horace
The vortex-l posts started to show up with Resent to: undisclosed-
recipients: ; on June 28. I wonder who the undisclosed-
recipients: ; are?
Regards,
Horace Heffner
i recommend thinking that undisclosed-recipients = people who have
subscribed to the vortex-list.
On 02/07/07, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The vortex-l posts started to show up with Resent to: undisclosed-
recipients: ; on June 28. I wonder who the undisclosed-
recipients: ;
This subject is covered in:
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/consolidated_laws.pdf
page L-21.
It is also important to read any sections with the character string
abandon.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
Why then was this change just made on June 28? It wasn't necessary
before that.
On Jul 2, 2007, at 1:06 AM, Esa Ruoho wrote:
i recommend thinking that undisclosed-recipients = people who
have subscribed to the vortex-list.
On 02/07/07, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
Paul Lowrance wrote (about Horace):
I was brief because of our last encounter, in which you assumed error in
my
sentence. Fact is my sentence did not contain enough information to make
such a
determination, and therefore you should have asked.
There WAS error in the sentence because it was
Nick Palmer wrote:
P.S. When I referenced Alice through the Looking Glass originally I stated
that it was the Red Queen who claimed that words mean etc. I was wrong, it
was Humpty Dumpty. I would have welcomed correction...
That's OK, Nick. I just misspelled leisurely and no one corrected
On Jul 2, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
I just got a notice from Walmart that shipping of Ed Storm's book
*The Science of Low Energy Nuclear Reaction* is delayed. If you
read it carefully though it says if it doesn't ship in 10 days they
will CANCEL YOUR ORDER if you don't
Free energy schemes are a dime a dozen these days
Here's my 2 cents worth for near-Independence-Day (energy independence).
Perhaps someone can raise the ante to a dime.
The water dimer consists of two water molecules loosely bound by a
hydrogen bond. It is the smallest water cluster
On Jul 2, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
The bond does have net extractable energy which can be replenished
easily by exposure to sunlight.
In fact - it would seem from the experiments, that by just breaking
this bond in humid air, as much as 4,000 cal/mol of energy is
released.
Hi Jones,
In fact - it would seem from the experiments, that by just breaking this
bond in humid air, as much as 4,000 cal/mol of energy is released.
Absorbed you mean? Evaporating the (H2O)2 dimer into unbounded H2O's , like
evaporating liquid water (combination of n-mers), should absorb
Good points made by Michel and Horace, as I was heavily influenced in
this thought (at the time I read the Paynter paper) by the Graneau work.
Even now, I am not sure whether their assertion is wrong or right, but
the same general idea of the bond formation process absorbing energy is
also
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:55:41 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
oops - (my copy editor is late arriving, once again)
and so the neutron being about ~1838 times more massive ...
should be more massive than an electron... and there are certain to be
other errors of haste.
BTW
Wikipedia seems a bit imprecise on the common up and down quark
mass. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark
I wonder if the problem is the degree of nucleus excitation. The up
and down quark mass seem fairly straightforward to me (in my
simplistic Newtonian pea brained way of
--- Robin van Spaandonk
Perhaps one implication is that each that each quark
comprises a pair of particles, each with a mass Pi^5
times that of the electron.
Well...
Don't keep us in suspense...or are we supposed to put
on a copy of Firesign and try to guess the disease
before it's too late
On Jul 1, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Michael Foster wrote:
If you think you're upset about my Griggs experiments, you're
really going
to be pissed when I tell you about my pulsed deuterium plasma
experiments
using a cathode of activated porous carbon with vapor deposited
palladium.
This line of
... shouldn't have been so precise - a better
cadndidate is the tau neutrino.
Upper bound on the tau-neutrino mass from the
previously unobserved decay mode is 157 MeV
--- Horace Heffner
Md = 313.471
...curious cross connection with the other thread.
This is close to twice the mass of the 156.7 'mystery
particle,' which could be a tau neutrino
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Horace Heffner wrote:
The vortex-l posts started to show up with Resent to: undisclosed-
recipients: ; on June 28. I wonder who the undisclosed-
recipients: ; are?
Which messages? Not this one (for example.)
My own incoming vortex-L message stream has no resent-to line
Just a test, I'm BCC'ing this to a fake email address.
On 7/3/07, William Beaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Horace Heffner wrote:
The vortex-l posts started to show up with Resent to: undisclosed-
recipients: ; on June 28. I wonder who the undisclosed-
recipients: ; are?
On Jul 2, 2007, at 5:55 PM, William Beaty wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Horace Heffner wrote:
The vortex-l posts started to show up with Resent to: undisclosed-
recipients: ; on June 28. I wonder who the undisclosed-
recipients: ; are?
Which messages? Not this one (for example.)
Yep,
On Jul 2, 2007, at 5:55 PM, William Beaty wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Horace Heffner wrote:
The vortex-l posts started to show up with Resent to: undisclosed-
recipients: ; on June 28. I wonder who the undisclosed-
recipients: ; are?
Which messages? Not this one (for example.)
Yep,
Mp = mass of proton (2 up + 1 down) = 938.272 MeV/c^2
Mn = mass of neutron (1 up 2 down) = 939.566 MeV/c^2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron
Shows neuron beta decay as the decay:
down - up + electron + anti-neutrino
Green, in *The Fabric of the Cosmos* gives the mass of the up quark
as
23 matches
Mail list logo
