http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf
search for slides starting at
The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME)
An electric super current is induced in the quarks because the direction of
their momentums are changed by the magnetic field line.
In the slide titled: The CME in
More:
It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction as
its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel each
other along a line axial to the magnet pair.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I did not think quarks were meant to exist in such separation?
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
More:
It looks like the magnetic field drives the quark in the same direction as
its spin. This makes sense because two magnets will attract or repel each
Greetings Vortex-l,
Not sure IF the Vortex-l spam oddities have been resolved.
From Alain Coetmeur of Paris and his Scoop.it+ .. website
http://www.google.com/patents/US20140098917
Also...Not sure why some of my most important messages have
wound up in SPAM. Especially from one sender sources.
Quark separation causes a quark plasma. When two heavy ions of lead atoms
collide in a ion collision, a quark plasma is produced. If the collision is
off center, a strong magnetic field is generated from the vortex motion
induced in the quark plasma.
The results of these kinds of collisions are
In simple terms, I now understand how a magnetic field can produce
subatomic particles out of the vacuum.
When virtual particles are produced by uncertainty from the vacuum, they
are created in a particle and antiparticle set to conserve vacuum energy.
The Chiral Magnetic Effect (CME) changes
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Is our Government...a foot
Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
Ron Kita wrote:
Is our Government...a foot
Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.
Also - Piantelli admits to using uranium, thorium and plutonium in some kind of
activation process. No wonder he sees
Axil--
That's a much better presentation than the other one. I now understand the
charge separation in the quark soup along a line.
In the solid state, the local effects of the magnetic fields that result from
SPP AND SP conditions would seem to cause CME also at the location. With
Just a heads up that Gmail continues to move some Vortex messages to the
spam folder. If you use Gmail, an easy way to find them is to go to the
spam folder and search for Vortex. Nearly everything in the results will
be legitimate Vortex mail.
I suspect the filter they're using to send
With quarks coming loose and superconductivity who know what reactions may
be taking place in Rossi Ni lattice.
One reason why LENR is go confusing is the vast number of nuclear reactions
that can occur when the strong force that holds matter together is
disrupted.
There is also a vast number
The patent pub (see the link below) that Alain sent through has a number of
reactions listed that make up the vast number you are talking about. Its an
interesting document.
http://www.google.com/patents/US20140098917
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
I think Piantelli is only looking to compete with the Japanese and
identifying a transmutaion reaction that takes care of some depleted
Uranium. It would be a real head ache for somebody to add those fissile
materials to a clean lenr reactor. It would become an NRC target.
Piantelli has
The primary Piantelli reaction is exclusively based on hydrogen/nickel to
copper. This is a weak reaction as far as LENR goes. This is also how Rossi
started out, but I think Rossi has increased his LENR power level to move
on to more energetic reaction channels. But it is hard to tell what
Rossi
It seems that the patent pub that Alain has identified is Piantelli's attempt
to add a shield for neutrons with boron and add lead for gammas to the nano Ni
reactor.
- Original Message -
From: Ron Kita
To: vortex-l
Cc: ron kita
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 4:31 AM
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:33:33 -0400:
Hi,
I don't think you need the rectenna at all. According to the wiki page the
actual rectification is done by a diode anyway. Solar cells are also diodes.
The primary difference between the rectenna and the solar cell is that
So I'm a programmer, and you're all probably wondering what this has to do
with Vortex and LENR.
Well.. I have done a lot of work in second life and I actually created a
lot of virtual items and their underlying scripts that brought them to life
by interacting with the physics engine.
I am also
Greetings, Blaze,
What a pleasant surprise to discover you do other things besides betting - for
a living. Or have I got that wrong?
Regarding LUA:
LUA is an interesting programming language. Reminds me of C++, and C#. I
programmed in LUA extensively on and off for a number of years
Yeah I work for the second largest enterprise software company. Tbh, I
see my betting as a higher contribution than my software. Providing odds
for critical events allows people to plan for the future .. something we
all sorely need. For example, saying that LENR has a 50% of occurring
19 matches
Mail list logo
