[Vo]:Software collision experiment

2014-06-26 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Hi all, I was wondering about the higher then expected rates of fusion seen in accelerator experiments at moderate speeds seen by researcher and explained by electron screening. The fundamental paper Kim et all i basing his theory on is in a sense interesting and can be a reality, but I did only

Re: [Vo]:Say it ain't so, Joe

2014-06-26 Thread Lennart Thornros
Maybe you are right Kevin. The Swedes are making it hard for you. Damned Swedes. I did not know the Swedes were obligated to do anything for you? Have you paid for it? Or do you think they owe it Rossi and he does not want your $250k - wonder why. Some times the best Strategy is to hurry up and

Re: [Vo]:Software collision experiment

2014-06-26 Thread James Bowery
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: The fundamental paper Kim et all i basing his theory on is in a sense interesting and can be a reality, but I did only see that they manage to fit the model to the data, not really a proof of that the

Re: [Vo]:Software collision experiment

2014-06-26 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Over fitting was my feeling when reading about Kim et al. On the other hand if you can make use of first principles and simulate a collision that would be great for understanding of what happens in a collision. Of cause assuming that QED is good enough to model the electrodynamic stage of the

Re: [Vo]:Software collision experiment

2014-06-26 Thread Eric Walker
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com wrote: My thought is the following, if the proton hit the hydrogen atom fast enough the electron field does not adapt fast enough and I would assume that the picture is like a bullet penetrating a shield. Here the

Re: [Vo]:Say it ain't so, Joe

2014-06-26 Thread Kevin O'Malley
I am right. And as I said earlier, I think I have learned enough about your perspective not to listen to your advice. On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com wrote: Maybe you are right Kevin. The Swedes are making it hard for you. Damned Swedes. I did not

[Vo]:C60D60 - Fullerene Deuteride as a fusion fuel?

2014-06-26 Thread Jones Beene
Imagine... a Fullerene... which is of course 60 atoms of carbon arranged in the famous tightly bound sphere, and known to be superconductor in certain conditions -- but now we fully hydrogenate these carbon atoms with deuterium to produce C60D60. I can think of no reason that this cannot be

[Vo]:11 Hinderances To LENR

2014-06-26 Thread Kevin O'Malley
11 Hinderances To LENR http://newenergytreasure.com/2014/05/10/10-hinderances-to-lenr/ Posted on May 10, 2014 http://newenergytreasure.com/2014/05/10/10-hinderances-to-lenr/ by C. T. Amos http://newenergytreasure.com/author/jfavrlxt/ http://newenergytreasure.com/2014/05/10/10-hinderances-to-lenr/

Re: [Vo]:C60D60 - Fullerene Deuteride as a fusion fuel?

2014-06-26 Thread Kevin O'Malley
For a while we saw dozens of PhD dissertations of someone's favorite molecule entrapped in a fullerene. Why not ours? But CNTs make more sense for a V1DLLBEC theory. You constrain every vibrational reaction direction except up-or-down the tube. Things happen in 1 direction that don't happen in

Re: [Vo]:C60D60 - Fullerene Deuteride as a fusion fuel?

2014-06-26 Thread Kevin O'Malley
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Imagine... a Fullerene... which is of course 60 atoms of carbon arranged in the famous tightly bound sphere, and known to be superconductor in certain conditions -- but now we fully hydrogenate these carbon atoms with