Asking for further help:
Cn you please put this on your Facebook pages or send it everywhere
to alll places it could genearte answers and signatures?
*Hello!*
*I've started the petition Any person worldwide who has problems: Read and
H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
From the point of the calorimeter heat is not absorbed since no heat
vanishes.
The energy does vanish! You put in X amount of electricity but only a
fraction of X comes out. The rest goes into changing the chemical structure
of the egg you are cooking, or
A symmetrical pairing is made here so that two rotational emf devices are
powered on the same axle rotation: but from the relative viewpoint of each
sides 3 phase stator ring those sources of rotating magnetic flux are rotating
oppositely as each opposite view of the rotation dictates. To
A symmetrical pairing is made here so that two rotational emf devices are
powered on the same axle rotation: but from the relative viewpoint of each
sides 3 phase stator ring those sources of rotating magnetic flux are rotating
oppositely as each opposite view of the rotation dictates. To
A particularly intriguing notion of Konstantin Meyl's is that a complex
speed of light is derivable from the conventional interpretation of the
dielectric coefficient, rendering that conventional interpretation an
offense against the basic principles of physics:
Having looked at the Robert Greenyer video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyp14fnE1jQ and his observation of the wavy
nature of a commercial heater and the Lugana hotcat :
http://lenr.qumbu.com/web_hotcat_pics/141030_blackbody_04.png
Greenyer notes the wavy structure of an electric heating
Right James. I think his work is very interesting. I'm interested to know
when someone finally digs into it w/ some technical background and can see
what is good, and what is bad, about it.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:45 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
A particularly intriguing notion
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Only the shadow hypothesis requires the ceramic to be visually
transparent -- the other two just could depend on thermal conductivity.
The shadow hypothesis has always seemed like a stretch to me. It sounds
speculative.
Eric
From a colleague:
I can't help but think this is backwards, and is the more offensive
departure, not from orthodoxy (which always deserves to be challenged) but
from simplicity (Occam) and common sense. Still, he's not far off the
track because of the close connection between the speed of light
Interesting, thanks for sharing.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:46 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
From a colleague:
I can't help but think this is backwards, and is the more offensive
departure, not from orthodoxy (which always deserves to be challenged) but
from simplicity (Occam)
10 matches
Mail list logo
