Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 9:45 PM, "harv...@yahoo.com [teslafy]"
wrote:
My newest facebook friend made the following comment after requesting to
be
Here is an interview of André Füzfa is the local newsweek:
http://www.levif.be/actualite/sciences/maitriser-la-gravitation-le-belge-qui
-bouscule-la-theorie-d-einstein/article-normal-447671.html
It is written in French.
Arnaud
_
From: Rich Murray [mailto:rmfor...@gmail.com]
Sent:
on reddit an "Explain me like I'm 5" quetion on LENR:
https://www.reddit.com/r/LENR/comments/40kxpf/eli5_help_me_understand_lenr/
"Firstly, let me say I do hope that LENR exists and is viable as it would
be an enormous benefit to the world and humanity.
However, being that I don't have a lot of
Jed--
I may not understand what you are calling to as a NUCLEAR FUSION REACTOR. I
assume you are not saying Rossi’s reactor is a NUCLEAR FUSION REACTOR. I
consider whatever is the source of excess energy in Rossi’s reactor it is not
similar to the source of energy as envisioned from a
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/01/jan-12-2016-lenr-info-only.html
Daily Notes just sketched- more tomorrow,
One of the papers sounds really interesting
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
It produces ~23.8 MeV per D+D reaction, as closely as anyone has been able
> to measure it. Admittedly that is not very close. See p. 8:
>
> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Hagelsteinnewphysica.pdf
>
This is an inference
Initiation of nuclear fission reactions under laser irradiation of Au
nanoparticles in the presence of Thorium aqua ions
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Jed
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Eric Walker wrote:
>
> This is an inference that has been made, using a lot of assumptions,
>> including an assumption that it's a stable ratio.
>>
>
> You can see it is stable, in Fig. 6, and in
Eric Walker wrote:
> Pd-D produces helium in the same ratio as plasma fusion reactors do, so
>> obviously it is a d-d reaction.
>>
>
> This is incorrect on two accounts. First, PdD does not produce helium in
> the same ratio as plasma fusion reactors.
>
It produces
Eric Walker wrote:
This is an inference that has been made, using a lot of assumptions,
> including an assumption that it's a stable ratio.
>
You can see it is stable, in Fig. 6, and in various other studies.
> Let's do admit that it's not very close.
>
Way closer
"An early experiment consisted of a huge tank of perchloroethylene buried
deep in the earth (the solar neutrino telescope). The neutrinos detected
were only about a third of those expected from the best models of the Sun's
interior. Since we have accurate measurements of the amount of energy
>From the link that Arnaud sent, there is an interesting possible
application (emphasis mine). Google translated.
"André Füzfa: that's it! My basic question was how to generate gravity at
will. And how to do it on the basis of the technology we have now. Magnetic
fields (or electric) are the
It has become apparent to me now, that the sun is powered by a cold fusion
reaction based on metalized hydrogen. This compound is one of the special
compounds that support LENR. The structure of this material makes it
indestructible via monopole magnetism and forms the basis for the internal
heat
Bob Cook wrote:
> I may not understand what you are calling to as a NUCLEAR FUSION REACTOR.
> I assume you are not saying Rossi’s reactor is a NUCLEAR FUSION REACTOR.
>
Of course it is. What else could it be? Assuming the thing works at all it
is similar to Pd-D cold
Peter Gluck wrote:
> a question- in your opinion, what are the similaries betwee the PdD wet
> and the NiH dry a la Rossi-warm and hot systems and what justifies taking
> them together scientifically Are they connected more by what we know or
> about what we do not know
What underpins the strong force (the color force) is monopole magnetism in
a superconductive context. Certain hard to produce chemical base crystal
arrangements can produce this superconductive monopole magnetism. This
class of chemicals in a nanoparticle format can disrupt the strong force
and
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Pd-D produces helium in the same ratio as plasma fusion reactors do, so
> obviously it is a d-d reaction.
>
This is incorrect on two accounts. First, PdD does not produce helium in
the same ratio as plasma fusion
Eric--
I doubt your explanation is correct.
The fracking is fairly shallow and the pressures not to great. Helium is not a
very good lubricant relative to water. The helium would escape quickly in most
fractured rocks and not create much pressure to induce earthquakes. The
injected water
Dear Jed, I will answer with an Ego Out editorial (not today)
Cold Fusion must become an energy source as all the other, even more
reliable- the longer term task is to function without any energy taken from
outside- but now the performance is given by the energy balance- the!MW
plant has proced
Only got a moment but wanted to interject a comment and a thought here, I think
this line of investigation has the low hanging fruit that could finally get us
over the cusp, I hope the researchers will use LENR as a test bed for their
investigation because I am convinced it represents
I wonder if any of the nano tubules can be salvaged? Would they not likely be
supercats? It would be a much easier way to make robust cats for home
experiments.
Fran
-Original Message-
From: Brad Lowe [mailto:ecatbuil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 10:42 PM
To: vortex-l
Eric Walker wrote:
>
> You can see it is stable, in Fig. 6, and in various other studies.
>>
>
> Please take a closer look, and please cite the other studies that give
> solid support to the conclusion that it's a stable ratio.
>
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MilesMcorrelatio.pdf
>
> http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MilesManomalousea.pdf
>
Thank you for the papers. I'm pretty interested in this question, so I'll
read through all three.
Tritium
Good points Fran. I remember a past discussion about nano-antennas greatly
amplifying EM, which presumably would also affect space/time according to
this theory.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:47 AM Roarty, Francis X
wrote:
> Only got a moment but wanted to interject a
Peter Gluck wrote:
Cold Fusion must become an energy source as all the other, even more
> reliable- the longer term task is to function without any energy taken from
> outside- . . .
>
Cold fusion has often been observed in heat after death, with no input
energy. I am
I meant to say:
In the 21st century, the public and the regulators will never allow a
nuclear reactor to be used *without 100% certainty that it is completely
understood and fully in control*.
They may not allow it under any circumstances.
- Jed
may I cite these ideas thanks?!
a question- in your opinion, what are the similaries betwee the PdD wet and
the NiH dry a la Rossi-warm and hot systems and what justifies taking them
together scientifically Are they connected more by what we know or about
what we do not know about them?
peter
On
27 matches
Mail list logo