Re: [Vo]:Fission may be the best fit for future LENR

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > Nuclear fission has a lot of critics, and rightly so ... but all of the > problems of fission derive from trying to control a multi-ton critical mass > of explosively enriched U in a steam pressurized reactor. Even with

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 2:57 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > TWO ideas about noble gases and fuel preparation: > > > >1. Being inert, they can be used in combination with H or D to diffuse >into a metallic lattice and cause mico-cracking with creation

RE: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

TWO ideas about noble gases and fuel preparation: 1. Being inert, they can be used in combination with H or D to diffuse into a metallic lattice and cause mico-cracking with creation of LENR active sites with large internal surface areas for formation of SSP’s. 2. Repeated cycling,

[Vo]:Fission may be the best fit for future LENR

Nuclear fission has a lot of critics, and rightly so ... but all of the problems of fission derive from trying to control a multi-ton critical mass of explosively enriched U in a steam pressurized reactor. Even with that major design problem, the French have demonstrated to the rest of the