With mounting evidence of a 9th planet and of a major cosmic impact in the
time of humans (around 12,800 years ago) our understanding of the origins
of civilization and our conception of the solar system
​appears to be
undergoing a significant change.
Sorry if i've been unclear - i've already done it. It's done. No New
physics. No magic. No possibility of error. Definitive, conclusive,
indisputable, unambiguous and unequivocal proof positive, it's in the can,
it's a wrap, a done-deal, a fait accompli, an actual physical gain, not an
Perhaps it is possible to devise a mathematical/conceptual framework for
mechanics in which Newtonian mechanics would exist as a special case but
the alternative framework would allow for the construction of a perpetual
motion machine . It would be like going back in time to the 17th century
and
What, you mean Rar Energia? It's junk, nothing to do with me, aside from
actually bothering to pull the data back in 2013:
http://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5591=0=asc=mrvibrating=465
..the torque / angle plots are identical for all three of their supposed
'contingent
How can anyone validate when there is no data from a five year old system?What
is claimed for the device? Where is a video of the unit running?
From: Vibrator !
Sent: Sunday, June 3, 2018 11:05 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Successful Mechanical
..right, just spammed it to Tajmar. Who could possibly be more qualified
or interested? Plus he's a Kraut, so there's a good chance he's already
aware of the Bessler case..
Was really hoping to give UK academia first dibs, but they're apparently
far too sensible..
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 4:05
I've only started this thread in the attempt to get independent data.
It's been just over a week since achieving certainty. None of the uni's
are responding to my crank emails, for some strange reason.
Perhaps you could help refine my template?
"Dear proper physics-talking dudes, please find
I busted Rarenergia within a couple of days. Went through the patent,
tested the proposed gain principle, found no variation in the force /
displacement integrals for either of the three loading conditions they
claimed asymmetries for - green positive bar, blue positive bar, yellow
neutral bar
No not me, tho Grimer deserves a nod for first bringing this case to my
attention many years ago...
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 5:47 AM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> Good to see you're still kicking. How many grand and great grands have you
> now?
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 5:33 PM Frank Grimer
Here we have all the elements of a fine scam. He is taking the Rossi play book,
page 1.
1.
no independent data
2.
no independent experiments
3.
claim earlier experiments were wildly positive
4.
From: Frank Grimer <88.fr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday,
It looks like $4M spent over about 18 months with no data at all. Even if it
worked, 30 kW is far too small. The payback period would be thousands of years!
How could anyone fall for this scam? I'll bet the small unit in Brazil was
rigged to produce an effect sufficient to separate an
11 matches
Mail list logo
