Re: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection

2018-12-03 Thread mixent
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:54:02 -0500: Hi, [snip] >How do you know that gluons exist? Has one ever been isolated? Not that I know of. However for that matter I don't really believe in light neutrons either. :) > >On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM wrote: > >> In reply

[Vo]:Mein Kampf; My Struggle against Einsteinian Reciprocity

2018-12-03 Thread Harvey Norris
https://www.quora.com/How-can-we-interpret-general-theory-of-relativity/answer/Harvey-D-NorrisHere I have shown how things have been misinterpreted in context of the  relative observers. In a nutshell the power input is symmetrical between sendings of vibrations connected together to convey

Re: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection

2018-12-03 Thread CB Sites
Every story on dark matter simply leaves me confused and perplexed. The first question I would ask is what is the spin of dark matter. Is it a fermion or boson? If it's a fermion, it has to interact and if it interacts why is it nearly impossible to see the interaction. If it's a Boson,

Re: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection

2018-12-03 Thread Axil Axil
How do you know that gluons exist? Has one ever been isolated? On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM wrote: > In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Mon, 3 Dec 2018 > 14:12:32 > +: > Hi Bob, > > Just a guess, but IIRC most of the mass of Neutrons comprises gluons, so > perhaps > a

Re: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection

2018-12-03 Thread mixent
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:12:32 +: Hi, PS: Here's a thought: what if the gluons are really just the relativistic mass of fast moving quarks? In that case a light neutron would just have quarks that were moving more slowly. Regards, Robin van

Re: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection

2018-12-03 Thread mixent
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:12:32 +: Hi Bob, Just a guess, but IIRC most of the mass of Neutrons comprises gluons, so perhaps a light neutron would just contain lower energy gluons? (Reminiscent of Jones' theory from years back.) >Robin— > > >

Re: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection

2018-12-03 Thread Jones Beene
In case the previous suggestion wrt rubidium electrolysis rang a few bells - going all the way back to 1994 when Bush/Eagleton published  'Evidence for electrolytically induced transmutation and radioactivity correlated with excess heat in electrolytic cells with light water rubidium salt

Re: [Vo]:Strange Radiation

2018-12-03 Thread Axil Axil
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru=en=y=_t=en=UTF-8=https%3A%2F%2Fmephi.ru%2Fcontent%2Farticles%2Findex.php%3FELEMENT_ID%3D1689%26SHOWALL_1%3D1= This is a link to a translated Russian paper that shows what is producing the strange radiation. This plasmoid/soliton is what is the cause of

[Vo]:Strange Radiation

2018-12-03 Thread Nigel Dyer
I have recently been looking at "Strange Radiation" and have found a very good review from 10 years ago, whose title indicates that it is about LENR, but in fact it is mainly about strange radiation.  It is at http://www.second-physics.ru/reviews/LENR-ru.pdf Like many of the documents/papers,

Re: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection

2018-12-03 Thread Jones Beene
The $64 question, from the standpoint of explaining LENR in the context of dark matter - is this: what would be the primary mechanism for excess heat and how could one optimize for it (or prove the hypothesis) in a simple electrolysis cell ? The "mirror neutron," if it is shown to be dark

RE: [Vo]:Dark Matter as a "sterile antineutron" and the LENR connection

2018-12-03 Thread bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Robin— Regarding my recent comments on the stable of primary particles in the standard model, I had in mind that a light “mirror neutron” would necessarily contain light quarks. not the same as the primary quarks the are imagined per the standard theory. Is there another explanation for a