Sorry - it seems I got the polarity of the reaction torque wrong. The reaction
torque from the orbiting motors acts to increase the rotation rate of the
central rotor so that the total angular momentum as seen from the central
bearing (which produces no torque as its motor is free-wheeling)
Hi Vibrator,
Since you NEED to know, I will point out where the fallacy lies. When the
orbiting motors activate to stop the orbiting rotors from rotating, you have
neglected the reaction torque of these motors. The reaction torque acts back
on the central rotor, also stopping its rotation.
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:23:46 -0500:
Hi,
Biological experiments are always tricky, because volatile compounds can carry
radioactive nuclei into the air and away from detectors.
>Biberian, J.P., ed. *J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci.* Vol. 28. 2019
>
Biberian, J.P., ed. *J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci.* Vol. 28. 2019
https://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedza.pdf
Proceedings of the International Conference on the Application of
Microorganisms for the Radioactive Waste Treatment, Busan, South Korea, May
2018
These papers are
Somewhat ironic that interest in LENR has an ~11 year period... which is also
seen in the sunspot cycle...
... which really isn't exactly 11 years, but... somehow it manages to be a very
good fit over time.
One 'big picture' irony lies in the fact that solar energy itself has become
See Fig. 1, Downloads per month, here:
https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1213
The trend line in this graph so far is remarkably stable and symmetrical.
It peaked after 11 years in 2013. If present trends continue, it will fall
close to zero around 2024.
The bottom graph, Google Trends
This starts to sound like the Linevich patent. A poor guy in Vladivostok who
claimed more out than in with unbalanced rotors
From: Vibrator !
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2019 11:34 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A simple example of Mechanical Over-Unity
The system is closed,
7 matches
Mail list logo
