Re: [Vo]:Electron capture acceleration via NMR ?

2021-12-01 Thread Bill Antoni

On 2021-12-01 19:33, Jones Beene wrote:

[...]

"IF" (big if) *unusually high hydrogen output* from an RF electrolysis 
cell can be demonstrated, then good evidence of what is happening to 
account for the gain - whether it is Millsean/Holmlid or instead is 
related to nuclear beta decay, can be as simple and foolproof as the 
detection of anomalous argon.


FWIW, excess hydrogen output (relative to Faraday efficiency) has been 
measured in plasma electrolysis cells in the early 2000s by Mizuno et 
al., but they found it to be correlated with negative heat (endothermic 
reaction). When excess heat was present, there was no excess hydrogen.


Furthermore, in their case the overall energetic efficiency was low due 
to the high voltages required (hundreds of volts).


See Mizuno's papers here:

- 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239053742_Hydrogen_Evolution_by_Plasma_Electrolysis_in_Aqueous_Solution


- 
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237284616_Generation_of_Heat_and_Products_During_Plasma_Electrolysis_in_Liquid


Cheers, BA

Re: [Vo]:Electron capture acceleration via NMR ?

2021-12-01 Thread Jones Beene
This article was sent to me on the related topic of 'magnetic water-splitting' 
(related to NMR in the obvious way).

Magnet doubles hydrogen yield from water splitting
Aligning the spin states of oxygen intermediates overcomes a bottleneck in 
electrolysishttps://cen.acs.org/physical-chemistry/Magnet-doubles-hydrogen-yield-water/97/web/2019/06
There is a case to be made for an entirely new way to split water - using RF 
with strong magnets and potassium NMR. A side effect would be cooling of the 
electrolyte.

"IF" (big if) unusually high hydrogen output from an RF electrolysis cell can 
be demonstrated, then good evidence of what is happening to account for the 
gain - whether it is Millsean/Holmlid or instead is related to nuclear beta 
decay, can be as simple and foolproof as the detection of anomalous argon.
The transmutation test of interest is called "K-Ar dating" and many University 
Geology Labs have the capability. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%E2%80%93Ar_dating
Of course there could be two different causes for gain but the more the merrier.



Re: [Vo]:Electron capture acceleration via NMR ?

2021-12-01 Thread Bill Antoni

On 2021-12-01 01:57, Robin wrote:

In an electrolytic cell both H and K will form at the cathode, though the K 
will only be short lived because it combines
with water to form KOH & H.
However if a K atom and an H atom form in close proximity to one another at the 
same time, then the possibility exists
that the K will catalyze a shrinkage reaction of the H (m=3), before it 
combines with water.
To facilitate this process, the KOH should be a saturated solution, and the 
cathode atoms as close together as possible.


This is interesting.

In a saturated KOH aqueous solution, if the voltage is high enough (you 
shouldn't be afraid to use tens of volts if necessary) and the cathode 
thin enough (in the form of wires), solid KOH will likely accumulate on 
the cathode and start dissociating into K metal beneath it. When that 
happens, it is possible to see small sparks and explosions as it reacts 
with water and presumably hydrogen.


This is much simpler (and safer) to observe with potassium carbonate and 
possibly bicarbonate, however. With KOH close to saturation, plasma 
electrolysis starts occurring first; you have to add more KOH than 
saturation at room temperature to make it accumulate when it is 
operating. Unsafe and wasteful.


I think something similar to molten salt electrolysis starts occurring 
under these conditions, with the difference that hydrogen from water 
dissociation is also present (interesting for LENR?). The gallery linked 
below shows short animations from tests with mainly K2CO3 and some 
NaHCO3 (which seemed to make accumulation easier) at various 
concentrations and conditions that I made months ago.


https://imgur.com/a/7OsftYm

Cheers, BA