Re: [Vo]:E-CAT Home to be $50/kW

2012-01-13 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
Just because the price is so low per kilowatt doesn't mean that you can buy it per kilowatt. I imagine that that's the price for the big ones, and the smaller ones are more expensive. Joe -- Dr Joe Karthauser On 13 Jan 2012, at 15:28, Energy Liberator energylibera...@gmail.com wrote: I've

Re: [Vo]:Hyperion Hyperlink

2011-11-30 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
Yes, the Amiga circuit diagram was full of jokes :). -- Dr Joe Karthauser On 30 Nov 2011, at 16:10, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: Am 30.11.2011 16:52, schrieb Mary Yugo: I knew they were coming out with something sexy. It has a pleasure sensor! I kid you not: http

Re: [Vo]:Rossi E-Cat web site up

2011-11-12 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
have it? I'm sure that although I've still got the physical artefacts of old programmes I wrote when I was a kid, the patterns are long gone. Joe -- Dr Joe Karthauser

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer

2011-10-25 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
I expect the EU has similar fair trade laws so I do not think Defkalion will be able to enforce this policy. I think it makes them look stupid even mentioning it. Who are they kidding? I suppose they are trying to kid Rossi, or at least humoring him. I'm not sure that we do. I don't

Re: [Vo]:Hypothesis explaining FTL neutrinos

2011-10-04 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
Love it! :) -- Dr Joe Karthauser On 5 Oct 2011, at 00:27, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: We don't allow faster than light neutrinos in here, says the bartender. A neutrino walks into a bar.

[Vo]:Neutrinos

2011-09-23 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
Neutrinos xkcd.com Sent with Reeder -- Dr Joe Karthauser

Re: [Vo]: Another advancement toward an atomic 'strobe-light'...

2011-09-22 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
On 23 Sep 2011, at 02:33, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote: According to my model, I would be willing to bet that one would see the electron move thru the nucleus with every oscillation… but it traverses the center region much more quickly than when it reaches the outer

Re: [Vo]:Universe Resolution Just Increased 13 Orders

2011-07-01 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
Hey Jouni, How does it falsify inflation theory? It's not immediately obvious to be how that conclusion can be reached from those results. Thanks, Joe -- Dr Joe Karthauser On 1 Jul 2011, at 20:04, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote: I think that proper interpretation

[Vo]:Revolutionary new aircraft engine.

2011-06-22 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
Jed, Here's one for you! (if you've not already seen it.) http://www.gizmag.com/d-dalus-uav-design/18972/ I've not found any video footage of it yet. I bet it's something to behold. Joe -- Dr Joe Karthauser

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:New BLP commercial - On You Tube

2011-06-04 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
Hey Fran, FYI, unlinked pages can't be captured by mirror/spider software, because they are orphaned, and no software would know that they existed. Joe -- Dr Joe Karthauser On 4 Jun 2011, at 00:53, Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote: Robin, your solution seems most likely

Re: [Vo]:Happy Pi Day!

2011-03-14 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
Where is the derivation of phi in terms of a circle published? There are no references or names in that article. Thanks Joe -- Dr Joe Karthauser On 14 Mar 2011, at 18:19, Shek Singhal integral...@gmail.com wrote: Just curious if anyone else here has looked at alternate derivations of Pi

Re: [Vo]:Discovery News Article

2011-01-22 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
On 22 Jan 2011, at 01:43, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote: Article uses Robert Park as an authority on the subject. http://news.discovery.com/tech/cold-fusion-claims-resurface.html Harry What a horrible article. I'd be ashamed to have written that. It wasn't reporting by any

Re: [Vo]:Miles Mathis

2011-01-18 Thread Dr Joe Karthauser
On 14 Jan 2011, at 10:04, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote: A demolishing criticism of Miles Mathis, particularly on his paper about Pi being 4 (among many other things, Miles shows that Pi equals four, with an elegant(and wrong) proof, which basically boils down to this) That was a fun