Excellent. Theories worthy of the name are testable. Let's do that! Until then, they are written on the wind.
BillR > On Aug 31, 2016, at 9:59 AM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > > AA Rossi says he has a theory, so you are wrong. > Jed I know he has a theory, but I believe it keeps changing, and the > theorists tell me it has no merit." > > In your last comment you stated he did not have a theory. > I was not aware there was a consensus yet on the theory of how cold fusion > works. > > AA > > >> On 8/31/2016 9:37 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: >> a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: >> >>> The reaction must be nuclear in some form, even if it is not fusion. >> >> If you claim it is nuclear reaction of type A and it turns out to be B >> instead, that puts your patent in jeopardy. Since you cannot patent a >> theory, there is no point to mentioning one at all. That is according to >> David French. >> >> >>> Rossi says he has a theory, so you are wrong. >> >> I know he has a theory, but I believe it keeps changing, and the theorists >> tell me it has no merit. >> >> - Jed >
