Unfortunately, Abd was one of the list's most interesting contributors and
commentators. So your decision, while nice on paper, effectively declares
victory for the troll. It's your list. But I'm outta here.
Jeff Berkowitz
Select all, mark as read. Same as most other days lately.
Jeff
PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 08:11 PM 12/28/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
I think a lot of the reasoning about photons, above, is wrong. The red
shift has nothing to do with gravity, only the relative velocity of the
photon source relative to the observer.
Eek
I think a lot of the reasoning about photons, above, is wrong. The red
shift has nothing to do with gravity, only the relative velocity of the
photon source relative to the observer. If an event just outside the event
horizon of a black hole emits a photon, an observer at rest relative to the
I read all the relevant wikipedia pages. My conclusion is that this
question is very difficult and that the process of answering it will
involve rephrasing it in more precise terms. In particular the term event
horizon is a catchall for multiple distinct horizons, each backed by a
subtly different
Thanks for posting the link. There has been work like this at Lecce for
many years. I've posted this link before.
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Castellanonucleartra.pdf
Jeff
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On 22passi, Danielle Paserini
Just please don't put anything about alternative energy in an off-topic
thread. That was those of us interested in alternative energy can just
ignore the off-topic threads.
Jeff
For what it's worth, Harry, there is a bit of early history that played out
in a way similar to what you're describing.
Back in 1994, Focardi, Habel and Piantelli published this:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/1994/1994Focardi-AnomalousHeatNi-H-NuovoCimento.pdf
After which some folks at
http://www.ezra.chem.cornell.edu/cat_poem.pdf
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Researchers at the University of Georgia in the US have discovered a
possible form of
In their 12/12/12 Progress Blog posting, MFMP stated that there was a
dleliberate error in the data viewer, and challenged people to spot it.
*We have a “deliberate mistake” in the data viewer, if you are sober enough
at this time in the day, we challenge you to spot it.
*
Did anyone ever find
Is everyone taking into account the fact that the graphs for T_Glassout are
actually (T_Glassout - T_Ambient), while the graph for T_Glassin is the raw
T_Glassin and is not corrected for ambient? Or at least so they are labeled.
Jeff
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Harry Veeder
The difference between T_Mica and T_GlassIn seems to be about 5 degrees
larger than it was during calibration. I put the details in the progress
blog comments.
Jeff
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/14/2012 03:53 PM, Jeff Berkowitz wrote
, that is
for sure. Just posting data.
Jeff
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
The difference between T_Mica and T_GlassIn seems to be about 5 degrees
larger than it was during calibration.
I suppose . . . if all
millivolts (27.99 - 28.01 volts)
R/R0 varied by less than 0.005 ohm.
I am looking at 1 minute averages. This is very solid.
Jeff
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
I looked at the voltage, current, and R/R0 values over various periods and
they all look
Here's a 33 minute period from this morning. To me they look kind of
inverted - one goes up when the other goes down. At least in this sample.
The 50-minute cycles may be there but have to be confirmed by the math ...
the mind is sometimes too good at finding patterns.
Jeff
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012
The possible correlation with T_Ambient was being discussed in another
thread. Eric and Arnaud (?) pointed it out, I argued against jumping to
conclusions. Dunno.
Jeff
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I wrote:
http://i50.tinypic.com/2e49mbd.jpg
I
at 12:04 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 03:07 AM 12/13/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
I am looking at 1 minute averages. This is very solid.
Okay. This would not detect invisible excess input power due to power
supply high-frequency variations. At all.
This is what SRI
I looked at the voltage, current, and R/R0 values over various periods and
they all look completely flat to me. I don't see any evidence of erratic
power supply behavior. I'm not so sure about the correlation with T_ambient
either. If you zoom to the 14:00 - 14:50 period the ambient temp drops
Got from another LENR researcher:
There are several reported values for the enthalpy of formation of nickel
hydride with -8.8 kJ/mol being the lowest and -16.3 kJ/mol being the
highest at standard temperature and pressure.
He went on to show that given a wire containing 0.3g of Ni, enthalpy
As the comments on the posting suggest, it seems (in hindsight) a mistake
that MFMP chose to accept Celani's recommendation of building the cell from
quartz for safety reasons. The safety issues could have been addressed with
additional shielding and the only consequence would have been modest
Despite the thinness of the evidence and the ever-present contamination
concerns, my gut tells me the LENR community would benefit from more focus
on transmutation results. For one simple reason: transmutation results are
persistent, while excess heat is ephemeral and easier to wish away. And
Abd, I assume you're aware of the hazards of working with this stuff?
That being said, its melting point is not absurdly high - under 2400F.
Could you melt some under, say, an N2 or argon atmosphere, on perhaps a
ceramic surface, so that it spread out into a thin layer, and then cool it?
Jeff
PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
Abd, I assume you're aware of the hazards of working with this stuff?
That being said, its melting point is not absurdly high - under 2400F.
Could you melt some under, say, an N2 or argon atmosphere, on perhaps a
ceramic surface, so that it spread out
manner Abd. Take care my friend.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Dec 8, 2012 12:31 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Unobtainium and Beryllium
At 11:27 PM 12/7/2012, Jeff Berkowitz
7, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.comwrote:
At 06:50 PM 12/7/2012, Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Despite the thinness of the evidence and the ever-present contamination
concerns, my gut tells me the LENR community would benefit from more focus
on transmutation results. For one
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
Now we have this new result showing ~1 watt of excess heat at some high
operating power (not stated but sufficient to raise the cell temp to 350C).
By implication, I am asked
MFMP have done very careful work and documented it well. Yet when they
showed a watt or so of apparent excess heat around the U.S. Thanksgiving
holiday, they did not make a claim. Instead, they held it to be in the
noise, not clearly separable from the variance between their calibration
runs.
Now
It's bad news, but it's important.
In short, the contention now is that Celani did not account for effect of
pressure changes within the cell. Reducing the gas pressure reduces the
thermal conductivity of the gas. This reduces the temperature of cell
components like the metal flanges that are
Thanks Jed.
Rossi, Rossi, Rossi. I'm afraid this current wave of interest is not going
to end well.
Jeff
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
I have never heard of the Foreign Policy Journal. Anyway, see:
Or not.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2412567,00.asp
Jeff
http://io9.com/5963263/how-nasa-will-build-its-very-first-warp-drive
Has anyone competent to understand the arguments read the 1994 paper?
Jeff
, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
So a secondary power system that doesn't rely on the plant at all
(batteries, diesel generators, etc.) is mandatory.
Around two-thirds is right. Many online sources quote 32% and I recall
33% from a class I took eons ago.
Two other things:
1. Controlling the reactivity of an operating reactor is extremely complex.
See for example Section 3, Core Cell Improved Design, here:
No worries. Stuff happens. I probably shouldn't have sent the follow-up,
made it seem like a bigger deal than it should be.
Jeff
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 10:31 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW: To put this bug in perspective, I've been using the calchemy
Unicalc very frequently
I can't resist jumping back in at this point. These full bridge devices are
mostly used as motor controllers. In such applications you just need to
turn it on and have it supply an appropriate AC signal while the motor is
running and then turn it off. There's never any need for fine control or
I suspect the reason plant designs don't attempt to harness the decay heat
is that in one key accident scenario (massive LOCA) you aren't going to be
able to generate any steam pressure from core heat. Being able to address
this scenario is essential to getting licensed. So a secondary power
, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
F626-12
hard to track down.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.comwrote:
F626-12
Axil, absolutely right, yet I agree with Jack about the implementation.
When I did that LTSpice analysis of the simplified circuit, I was very
clear about how big a simplification it was for me to leave out the
isolation transformer and the loading current. The entire circuit as
described in the
Interesting. A U.S. nickel is 1.95mm thick.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
It's hard to know where to begin here but let me just say this that given the
speed of sound in
However a U.S. nickel is 75/25 copper/nickel. It might be possible to
figure out the speed of sound using information in this thread:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=277330
I'll look at it later.
Jeff
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote
://www.amazon.com/dp/B007T6XNCA/ref=pe_175190_21431760_M3T1_SC_dp_1
Jack
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting. A U.S. nickel is 1.95mm thick.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
It's hard to know where to begin here
Correct. Sanity check: if we imagine a hypothetical material with v =
430e3, d = 1 (meter); if v = 43e3, d = 0.1m ; 4.3e3, 0.01m. So the answer
for v = 5.63e3 must be slightly more than 0.01m.
James, I should have checked your math! ;-) The 1.95mm comment is a
nonstarter for two reasons, now.
of sound in the material.
And all this fussing is just to find out whether the phenomenon is real or
not.
If this stuff was easy everybody would be doing it.
Jeff
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
However a U.S. nickel is 75/25 copper/nickel. It might
http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5783
http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.3318
http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.4074
http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.3156
Analysis:
http://phys.org/news201795438.html
Refutation:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.4357
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
New
Refutation should have said Criticism.
Jeff
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5783
http://arxiv.org/abs/1007.3318
http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.4074
http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.3156
Analysis:
http://phys.org/news201795438.html
It's a really weird article. It starts off with this title:
Steven Jones replica: Pons Fleischmann XS Heat not from fusion
Then the author (Allen) goes on to quote Jones as follows:
... there is a confirmed and published effect showing products of d-d
[deuterium-deuterium] fusion at low levels.
emphasizing
(3a).
Eric
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a really weird article. It starts off with this title:
Steven Jones replica: Pons Fleischmann XS Heat not from fusion
Sorry if this confuses matters, but I recall Celani stating somewhere in
writing: believe me, this device is not a black-body radiator. It may
have been on that Italian site with 22 in the name. No time to hunt it
down just now ...
Jeff
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:29 AM, David Roberson
I've looked at this a little. It's been under study for over 30 years, so
the pros and cons are pretty well understood. The wikipedia page (thorium
fuel cycle) covers them. It's definitely feasible, probably an economic
win for countries with a lot of thorium (e.g. India), and arguably a little
at 6:49 PM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Jeff. Can enriched Thorium also be used for nuclear weapons?
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
I've looked at this a little. It's been under study for over 30 years, so
the pros and cons
There's actually a whole spectrum of these ideas, correct? For example
Robin's concept of using an MCF device as a source of 14.1MeV neutrons to
force fission in actinides (e.g. nuclear waste). Has anyone tried to
summarize or assemble a list of these? It could span from the completely
mainstream
LOL! I totally agree! Every time another set of those slides comes out, I
cringe at the thought of attempting to read them.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:01 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
He sure can fit a lot of words into one sentence...
Also, his powerpoint slide density matches
A friend (Mike, one of our little group here in Portland) found a
relatively low-cost way to rent a neutron detector:
http://shopping.netsuite.com/s.nl/c.817517/sc.7/category.13851/.f
So I have a question.
Is it possible that a lot of neutrons have gone undetected in LENR
experiments over the
Sorry, I cannot resist, though I'm sure it's appeared here before.
*Buzz http://www.imdb.com/name/nm741/*: I need to repair my turbo
boosters. Are you still using fossil fuels, or have you discovered
crystallic fusion?
*Woody http://www.imdb.com/name/nm158/*: Well, let's see, we got
to be a small IP holding company and keep chugging
along.
Help me out here. What am I missing.
Jeff
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, I cannot resist, though I'm sure it's appeared here before.
*Buzz http://www.imdb.com/name/nm741/*: I need to repair
drowningtro...@gmail.comwrote:
Where is he? and why isn't he contributing to the Vortex collective?
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/11/taylor-wilson/309132/
I have a friend, very smart guy, who I've been working on over time with
occasional CF/LENR tidbits and arguments. Lately he wrote this, and gave me
permission to send it along.
- - -
So, let's identify all the groups involved here, from the seekers to the
suckers. :-)
We have the seekers,
Heh. It's 23 years for some of the old timers on this alias (not me).
I'm particularly fond of this older transmutation paper:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Castellanonucleartra.pdf
There are various reasons to criticize the paper (only EDX was used for
analysis, other complaints) but I like
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/11/taylor-wilson/309132/
Can be found in here:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2012/11/sven-kullander-on-the-e-cat/
Jeff
In side email, someone pointed out that NRL rumor is a year old. I misread
the first part of the article and missed that. I wouldn't even have
bothered forwarding the link.
Jeff
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Daniel
Actually, I can attest that the National Weather Forecast Discussion for
Hurricane Sandy did indeed describe this ridge of high pressure over
Greenland. This was as it was moving north past Florida and the Carolinas,
several days before it made (second) landfall in New Jersey. They called
this
I have been relaxed about off-topic postings because I'm relatively new to
the group and was following the lead of others. If there's a desire to
enforce that rule more strictly I will be happy to stop doing it.
Jeff
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
May I
Off topic.
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:21 PM, lorenhe...@aol.com wrote:
This is for all the devoted Demo-rats, which can be confused with a small
furry rodent that lives in subways sewers, and can spread diseases to the
human population. The Rats used in many laboratories along with it's
are only
3A …
** **
The protection will be effective only for non repetitive small spikes, but
rather more to protect your phidgets.
** **
Arnaud
--
*From:* Jeff Berkowitz [mailto:pdx...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* dimanche 28 octobre 2012 02:42
*To:* vortex
Yes.
Leaving aside nightmare scenarios like nanobot infestations and genetically
modified diseases and the rest, sticking strictly to the economic
consequences of computer and mechanical technologies: there's some evidence
we're seeing these effects right now, in the unemployment numbers. I came
.
** **
Arnaud
--
*From:* Jeff Berkowitz [mailto:pdx...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* dimanche 28 octobre 2012 16:24
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Home made data logging ammeter
** **
Thanks Arnaud.
** **
The goal of the diodes is to protect
I have wondered the same thing. I guess the Phidgets folks are somewhat in
this space - if you look at the prices of the modules here, for example:
http://www.phidgets.com/products.php?category=8 and scroll down to the
green blocks, that's going to add up if you try to configure a system
with a
I'm glad you said it and I didn't.
I keep coming back to the idea that there must be more than one physical
phenomenon. Among other things, it would explain the difficulty in
reproducing results. If you've ever been responsible for troubleshooting a
complex system that just happens to have
Hi all, I built this USB-connected ammeter so we could log current flow
accurately and rapidly while doing electrolysis and also electroplating.
http://pdxlenr.blogspot.com/2012/10/a-pretty-good-data-logging-ammeter.html
Jeff
Almost casually, buried in what appears to be a theoretical article, on p.
117 of the link forwarded by Alan Fletcher (
http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol9.pdf), Takahashi describes a
reproduction of excess heat in a hybrid Ni-H system:
Now we refer some typical experimental data of heat
Following up on Eric's mail, I have gotten other feedback on the side
suggesting the excess heating can all be accounted for chemically in this
particular case. I cannot comment on your analysis, Jones, but it seems
caution may be called for here. (Unfortunately what received was actual
pdf's
Jones and Jed, thanks. Very interesting. I found that the two possible
refutation-type papers I received on the side are available, one on the
archive, one on New Energy Times (and maybe also on the archive, I didn't
check). Again, I recognize this was/is all probably well known to both of
you,
My own guess is that this comment will end up being another overwhelming
promise followed by another underwhelming delivery. It just seems to be a
pattern common to Mr. Rossi. I hope I'm wrong.
Again, I'm trying to play the dispassionate commentator here. I have no
position on whether he has
Krugman anticipate this.
http://www.princeton.edu/~pkrugman/interstellar.pdf
Jeff
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:39 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Vorl Bek's message of Mon, 22 Oct 2012 17:46:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
It looks like Aliens (interstellar types) favour Romney for
Sorry for not including this in the first mail, but I have to follow up
because it gives the flavor of the thing:
The remainder of this paper is, or will be, or has been, depending on the
reader's inertial frame, divided into three sections.
;-)
Jeff
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Jeff
I haven't followed this story carefully, but a friend of mine (who has)
wrote the following:
Uh, you should look into A123 Systems, who started it and what they did
before criticizing them. These guys developed and improved the Lithium
Iron Phosphate battery chemistry while at MIT, then spun out
Good question Peter. I've been wondering something similar, just slightly
more specific. Ni-H has gotten a lot of attention lately. But what sequence
of Pd-D experiments over the years was most significant to the ...slow
erosion of the psuedoskeptic position... that Abd described in email to
the
...@charter.netwrote:
Some Chinese company bought a 49% stake in A123 very recently, so is that
in addition to Johnson Controls???
-Mark
** **
** **
*From:* Jeff Berkowitz [mailto:pdx...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, October 21, 2012 10:16 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:A123
AM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
Good question Peter. I've been wondering something similar, just slightly
more specific. Ni-H has gotten a lot of attention lately. But what sequence
of Pd-D experiments over the years was most significant to the ...slow
erosion of the psuedoskeptic
I should add that I don't have the training or experience to take the lead
on such an effort. I am just a basically competent writer with an interest
in the subject matter.
Jeff
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
For the technical reader, this has already
Hi all, I finished writing up a few thoughts about the Godes / Brillouin
patent application, and published them on our blog:
http://pdxlenr.blogspot.com/2012/10/thoughts-about-godes-brillouin-patent.html
In the posting I acknowledge Abd directly and the rest of vortex. Thanks
again for helping
to do it.
Thanks,
Jack
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all, I finished writing up a few thoughts about the Godes / Brillouin
patent application, and published them on our blog:
http://pdxlenr.blogspot.com/2012/10/thoughts-about-godes-brillouin
The Santilli patent claims an electric arc. It's entirely unclear whether
that is the same invention or a different invention. If we're going afield,
we can also include Godes, who focuses on quite a different design but
claims a number of different embodiments. Godes first filed way back in
2005.
There is a history surrounding the apparent production of iron from arcs
between carbon rod electrodes. Extremely high voltages are not required.
You can find some material from obvious web searches.
Jeff
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
See
It's possible that as the electrolyte evaporates, and there is not
sufficient electrolyte to make a fully-immersed path from anode to cathode
(you'll have to confirm that), there are moments when the liquid withdraws
from point(s) on one of the electrodes - because of the tendency of water
to form
Eventually, Mr. Rossi will have to show something that can be independently
examined and verified completely outside of his control, or the inevitable
media and marketplace counter-reaction will set in because of the very
public nature of the claims. I'm sure even Mr. Rossi himself would agree
to himself as he experiences a short period of brain
death due to his attempt to describe the indescribable.)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Oct 18, 2012 12:24 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Experiment Started
It's
As others have pointed out, the only safe answer is to treat all
electrolysis experiments with respect, doing them with adequate
ventilation, whether that means under a fume hood or outdoors or the like.
Of course we may break these rules and get away with many things, up until
the unfortunate
When I read vortex, Google is constantly trying to sell me a Ford Fusion.
If only ... ;-)
Sure it can. I make such a comparison right here.
http://pdxjjb-econ-politics.blogspot.com/2012/05/parable-of-smart-frugal.html
It's not that your arguments are incorrect, but they are not very strong
arguments, either.
Jeff
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Craig Haynie
Mr. Krivit (New Energy Times) has also updated his critical comments about
Mr. Rossi, and the result is not paywalled.
FYI.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/Andrea-Rossi-Energy-Catalyzer-Investigation-Index.shtml
Jeff
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
A couple of us tried electrolysis with nickels in Borax today. No excess
heat was observed. There are details here:
http://pdxlenr.blogspot.com/2012/10/no-heating-observed-while-electrolyzing.html
Jeff
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
You might try to erode
Yes, I agree. I believe that work originated here:
http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/feature/rethinking-the-fall-of-easter-island/1
Feature article, so apparently not paywalled - I'm not a subscriber, but
I can see it.
Jeff
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:27 PM, David L Babcock
Here is an unrelated paper from ICCF that includes processing the electrode
material with heat:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Dash-Effect%20of%20Recrystallization-Paper.pdf
Jeff
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for all of
I'm shocked, shocked I say. ;-) Thanks Jed.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
False alarm. It was a piece of plastic that fell off the Rover.
- Jed
This morning I found a link that may be related to the borax and nickels
thing: http://www.sparkbangbuzz.com/els/borax-el.htm
I found it, believe it or not, here:
http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-159040.html
I had thought mods generally ban CF/LENR topics there, but I guess not
And, by golly, here's another interesting note: the energy required to
split water molecules by electrolysis is dramatically reduced in the
presence of ... nickel borate.
http://phys.org/news193055742.html
Jeff
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote
Another patent application, also with pulse generator circuitry. Since we
all know cold fusion can't be real, it must be something in the water. ;-)
;-)
Jeff
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:19 AM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
http://e-catsite.com/2011/12/07/ahern-cancels-citi5-appearance/
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo
