Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

[Jones Beene]

If I was offered a choice between owning 100% of Rossi's ecat IP and a cafe 
latte at Starbucks, the coffee wins, hands down.
 

On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 8:52 AM, "bobcook39...@gmail.com" 
<bobcook39...@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 

 #yiv1696070789 #yiv1696070789 -- _filtered #yiv1696070789 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 
4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv1696070789 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 
4 3 2 4;}#yiv1696070789 #yiv1696070789 p.yiv1696070789MsoNormal, #yiv1696070789 
li.yiv1696070789MsoNormal, #yiv1696070789 div.yiv1696070789MsoNormal 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:11.0pt;}#yiv1696070789 a:link, 
#yiv1696070789 span.yiv1696070789MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1696070789 a:visited, #yiv1696070789 
span.yiv1696070789MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
{color:#954F72;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1696070789 
.yiv1696070789MsoChpDefault {} _filtered #yiv1696070789 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 
1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv1696070789 div.yiv1696070789WordSection1 {}#yiv1696070789 
Brian—  With all due respect, there IS Rossi IP.  It was identified in the 
Rossi/IH contract in an Appendix—very specific.  I read it all.  It was 
generally referred to as E-Cat IP and specified in several different documents, 
including the E-Cat US patent as I recall.    It did not include much technical 
information about Pd and D reactions and reactors, which may cause it to be 
worthless SOUR GRAPES in some people’s estimation.     If it were worthless as 
you indicate, it certainly has spurred a lot of Ni-H LENR technology and LENR+ 
development (as Peter Gluck so consistently identifies) to produce investment 
in R around the World.  I admit that I am frequently confused, but not about 
Rossi’s alleged fraudulent life.  My main confusion is trying to understand the 
motives of people who attempt to discredit  Rossi’s work.  I am concluding 
after following the treatment of P in 1989 and thereafter that some of the 
same motives that drove the discrediting of P are pertinent to deciding how 
Rossi should be handled.  In a political realm I consider such motives would be 
labeled conservative and in opposition to progressive peoples’ motives.    Bob 
Cook  From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:25 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?  There is no IP!!!  Every time 
you forget or deny Rossi's fraudulent  life, you get confused. Rossi has 
absolutely nothing.    
 I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen about 
February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money changing 
hands.   There is potential for a huge fish fry, however. Bob Cook  
    

 
   

RE: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

[bobcook39923]

Brian—

With all due respect, there IS Rossi IP.  It was identified in the Rossi/IH 
contract in an Appendix—very specific.  I read it all.  It was generally 
referred to as E-Cat IP and specified in several different documents, including 
the E-Cat US patent as I recall.  

It did not include much technical information about Pd and D reactions and 
reactors, which may cause it to be worthless SOUR GRAPES in some people’s 
estimation.   

If it were worthless as you indicate, it certainly has spurred a lot of Ni-H 
LENR technology and LENR+ development (as Peter Gluck so consistently 
identifies) to produce investment in R around the World.

I admit that I am frequently confused, but not about Rossi’s alleged fraudulent 
life.  My main confusion is trying to understand the motives of people who 
attempt to discredit  Rossi’s work.

I am concluding after following the treatment of P in 1989 and thereafter 
that some of the same motives that drove the discrediting of P are pertinent 
to deciding how Rossi should be handled.  In a political realm I consider such 
motives would be labeled conservative and in opposition to progressive peoples’ 
motives.  

Bob Cook

From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:25 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

There is no IP!!!

Every time you forget or deny Rossi's fraudulent  life, you get confused. Rossi 
has absolutely nothing.



 
I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen about 
February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money changing 
hands.   There is potential for a huge fish fry, however.
 
Bob Cook
 
 

Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

[Brian Ahern]

There is no IP!!!


Every time you forget or deny Rossi's fraudulent  life, you get confused. Rossi 
has absolutely nothing.





I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen about 
February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money changing 
hands.   There is potential for a huge fish fry, however.

Bob Cook

Re: [Vo]:Bill Gates connection to LENR?

[Alain Sepeda]

To control, or to develop?

LENR cannot be controlled or it will die.
Modern entrepreneur know that.

Not more simple than controlling teenagers during springbreak.

2016-11-29 17:57 GMT+01:00 :

> With the recent information from Italy (Giuseppe, Navarro and Coppi)
> reported on Rossi’s blog;  the information from LENR Forum about Gates
> interaction with La Gatta (apparently in Padua, It during the ICCF-19);
> Texas Tech interaction with La Gatta’s firm in Italy;  La Gatta’s
> interaction with IH in N.C.,  and Gates support of LENR at Texas Tech, is
> Gates involved in IH via. La Gatta’s firm or Texas Tech or both?
>
>
>
> The plot thickens.  And the Court Case may reveal much more about the IH
> supporters and  action to control the Ni-H LENR technology.
>
>
>
> I suspect that a settlement of the Federal Case in Florida will happen
> about February 2017 with Rossi maintaining control of the IP and much money
> changing hands.   There is potential for a huge fish fry, however.
>
>
>
> Bob Cook
>
>
>
>
>