Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
the sort of conspiracy theory I've come to associate with SR hating
crackpots who think physicists are all brainwashed fools.
It's not necessary to be a brainwashed fool to be proved wrong. Or are
you implying that intelligence and education are synonymous with
On 01/31/2010 07:39 AM, Mauro Lacy wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
the sort of conspiracy theory I've come to associate with SR hating
crackpots who think physicists are all brainwashed fools.
It's not necessary to be a brainwashed fool to be proved wrong. Or are
you implying that
At 09:56 PM 1/30/2010, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
I think Krivit is confused on this.
I had already kind of gotten that impression from reading the blog.
Krivit's a reporter, right? Not a physicist? And if I read his blog
right, he's decided Storms, McKubre, and Hagelstein are wrong,
NET 34 is out. Read it carefully.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/
Feathers will be ruffled; yes, I know.
Your comments, questions and critique, as always, are invited as letters to
the editor, however, I will most likely not engage in debate on this here
in Vortex.
If you think you have
NET Letters Policy:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/contact/contact.shtml
At 12:33 PM 1/30/2010, you wrote:
NET 34 is out. Read it carefully.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/
On 01/30/2010 03:33 PM, Steven Krivit wrote:
NET 34 is out. Read it carefully.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/
Krivit says:
Bottom line, there is something real, no doubt. Nuclear, absolutely.
Potential for energy, yes. But fusion? I can’t know for sure, but at
this time, I highly
At 05:46 PM 1/30/2010, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/
Krivit says:
Bottom line, there is something real, no doubt. Nuclear, absolutely.
Potential for energy, yes. But fusion? I can't know for sure, but at
this time, I highly doubt it.
So if it's nuclear
At 08:12 PM 1/30/2010, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 03:33 PM 1/30/2010, Steven Krivit wrote:
NET 34 is out. Read it carefully.
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/blog/
Feathers will be ruffled; yes, I know.
You don't know half of it, Steve.
Your comments, questions and critique, as always, are
Thanks much for the explanation, Abd. Sounds plausible, whether or not
you're suffering from the unconscious bias Jed, no doubt rightly, feels
we all bring to things.
On 01/30/2010 08:01 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 05:46 PM 1/30/2010, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2010/34/343inexplicableclaims.shtml
This is a discussion of the Violante
presentation,
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2004/ICCF11/pres/64-Violante.pdf
Here, I will comment on the Krivit report,
pointing out how he has misunderstood and/or
10 matches
Mail list logo
