At 12:11 AM 4/2/2010, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 04/01/2010 07:28 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Re: [Vo]:checking my understanding of Lorentz contraction
At 02:04 PM 4/1/2010, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
But there is a limit suggested by this, that the maximum flattening is
by
Re: [Vo]:checking my understanding of Lorentz contraction
At 02:04 PM 4/1/2010, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
But there is a limit suggested by this, that the maximum flattening
is by one-half.
That is, that the Lorentz contraction is limited to one-half of the
original length (in the
There is no actual physical contraction.
Relativistic compression is actually Terrell rotation. Here's a great vid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQnHTKZBTI4
T
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com
wrote:
Re: [Vo]:checking my understanding of Lorentz
On 04/01/2010 07:28 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Re: [Vo]:checking my understanding of Lorentz contraction
At 02:04 PM 4/1/2010, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
But there is a limit suggested by this, that the maximum flattening is
by one-half.
This is false. There is no maximum. As an
4 matches
Mail list logo