You make good points about different requirements... not that for most
physicist what is assumed by theory is not extraordinary thus need no
serious evidence... This is the only and key problem: theory!
In fact I think it is a very many time replicated tragedy. As Thomas Kuhn
and Nassim nicholas
Actually, they considered only what entered the core of D+T. That is about
1/100 000 of the total that enters the whole machine for the shot.
2014-02-13 1:55 GMT-02:00 Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com:
Correct me if I'm wrong but they didn't really achieve OU because the
target only got 10% of the
Claims of fusion by laser with more output energy than input energy
for the first time.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/the-lasers-fuelling-hopes-of-unlimited-clean-nuclear-energy-9124237.html
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/13
That's a lot of caveats. The energy used to power up and fire is hundreds
of thosands greater. Probably many more caveats.
2014-02-12 16:54 GMT-02:00 Brad Lowe ecatbuil...@gmail.com:
Claims of fusion by laser with more output energy than input energy
for the first time.
for less than a billionth of a second
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
That's a lot of caveats. The energy used to power up and fire is hundreds
of thosands greater. Probably many more caveats.
2014-02-12 16:54 GMT-02:00 Brad Lowe
Blaze Spinnaker,
for less than a billionth of a second
And people complain about calorimetry in LENR
, Feb 12, 2014 3:03 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot fusion OU milestone reported
Blaze Spinnaker,
for less than a billionth of a second
And people complain about calorimetry in LENR
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
As a skeptic I demand that another independent group of scientists
replicate the results. How do we know that the input power required to
run the lasers is accurately measured? The list of possible errors is a
mile
Correct me if I'm wrong but they didn't really achieve OU because the
target only got 10% of the incident energy so the actual energy gain was in
a subsystem rather than in the whole system.
[m]
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at
I like your humor Eric.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 9:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot fusion OU milestone reported
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote
...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Feb 12, 2014 9:44 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot fusion OU milestone reported
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
As a skeptic I demand that another independent group of scientists
replicate the results. How
11 matches
Mail list logo
