At 10:42 AM 7/20/2012, Robert Lynn wrote:
The true test is how many parts remain on the bench after reassembly.
There are often parts left. No, the true test is if the thing still works.
(Many screws are redundant.)
(Yes, alternate assembly can be interesting, but pretty advanced for
a
no the name was added by a member, and finally, after long search I found
the trick.
the embedded photo is simple without legend, and the PPT author seems to
have made a big security errror is not cropping really the photo... (there
have been similar failur in PDF blackening that let the real
The strange device aside with lead screen is probably a large NaI gamma
ray scintillator / spectrometer.
In this photo, there looks to be a high voltage cable with rubber cap going
to one of the spark plugs on the visible reactor end.
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Alain Sepeda
From Abd,
...
When I was a kid, I took lots of things apart and looked at how
they were put together. Sometimes I even managed to put them
back together.
I still take things apart and look at how they are put together.
And sometimes I put things together.
Indeed, taking things apart can
The true test is how many parts remain on the bench after reassembly.
On 20 July 2012 14:52, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
From Abd,
...
When I was a kid, I took lots of things apart and looked at how
they were put together. Sometimes I even managed to put
murphy's 5th law: if you take apart and reassemble a device often
enough, you will end up with two devices.
On 07/20/2012 11:42 AM, Robert Lynn wrote:
The true test is how many parts remain on the bench after reassembly.
On 20 July 2012 14:52, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Hello group,
At first I hesitated in posting this potential news publicly, but since
it's already being discussed in several websites, I ought to share it
here as well. Why delay the inevitable?
You might remember Jim Dunn's presentation from ILENRS-12 posted on PESN
[1][2]. On page 9 it
Yeah, that's Vysotskii, looking old.
What's the big deal? Defkalion accidentally left the names of the
researchers in the photos they uploaded.
None of these people has told me a thing, by the way. I don't bug them,
because they have signed NDAs.
That's a pretty sad experimental setup, isn't
On 2012-07-19 23:52, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Yeah, that's Vysotskii, looking old.
What's the big deal? Defkalion accidentally left the names of the
researchers in the photos they uploaded.
Well, given the latest unconfirmed grave news of the company possibly
leaving the country, with all the
At 04:52 PM 7/19/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Yeah, that's Vysotskii, looking old.
Funny, it doesn't look like Vysotskii to me, the person sitting at
the table looks younger. But appearances can be decieving, it might
be Vysotskii. I've only seen photos.
Someone who actually knows Vysotskii
So.. what do you guys think: is Vysotskii an employee / contractor
there, or was he there for one of the third party tests [ or can that
distinction not be made at all ]?
In any case:
First we had just a website with a forum, then we had a photo of a front
door of a building with a defkalion
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Funny, it doesn't look like Vysotskii to me, the person sitting at the
table looks younger. But appearances can be decieving, it might be
Vysotskii. I've only seen photos.
I've only seen photos too. I don't recall meeting him. Could be wrong.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I've only seen photos too. I don't recall meeting him. Could be wrong.
You have his paper on biological transmutations on your site.
T
At 07:38 PM 7/19/2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I've only seen photos too. I don't recall meeting him. Could be wrong.
You have his paper on biological transmutations on your site.
Oh, he knows that! I'd thought that Jed
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Nothing wrong with making up stuff, it's *very* human, but it really helps
to be aware that this is what we are doing.
My impression is that you are trying to unmake stuff.
T
At 08:11 PM 7/19/2012, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Nothing wrong with making up stuff, it's *very* human, but it really helps
to be aware that this is what we are doing.
My impression is that you are trying to unmake
16 matches
Mail list logo
