[Vo]:July 7th E-Cat test report

2011-10-06 Thread Akira Shirakawa
Hello group, While we're waiting for more information about the E-Cat test currently being performed in Bologna (it looks like we will have to wait at least until tomorrow for publicly available detailed information), Daniele Passerini just posted this previously unpublished report on an

Re: [Vo]:July 7th E-Cat test report

2011-10-06 Thread Akira Shirakawa
On 2011-10-06 16:11, Akira Shirakawa wrote: http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/10/test-e-cat-7-luglio-2011.html According to Passerini (in one of his comments), there were Fat-Cat modules ready for use back in June, but they haven't been shown to Krivit during his visit in Bologna for a

Re: [Vo]:July 7th E-Cat test report

2011-10-06 Thread Jouni Valkonen
This was my number one hypothesis why Rossi did not let Krivit to see working E-Cat, because he had already perfected the self-sustaining E-Cat back then. He announced self-sustaining model in June 20th. Therefore there was not point of showing for Krivit an obsolete model, therefore electricity

RE: [Vo]:July 7th E-Cat test report

2011-10-06 Thread Robert Leguillon
Is there a long report for July 7th? I've noticed that the times on the graph do not match Bianchini's report at all. It appears that the graph may have been clipped during its stability phase. If it had leveled for a long period (during phase change) and then rose again, that would be

RE: [Vo]:July 7th E-Cat test report

2011-10-06 Thread Jouni Valkonen
I think that there has not been any serious arguments presented on heat after death discussion. Frankly it was just silly episode in discussion, where some who violently are opposing Rossi are just inventing ad hoc explantions when we are presenting them real data that is in direct contradiction

Re: [Vo]:July 7th E-Cat test report

2011-10-06 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote: We can only hope and pray that there is more power observed on the secondary than is supplied to the primary during peak energy application. If gains are only observed during heat after death, we will be arguing the results ad infinitum.

RE: [Vo]:July 7th E-Cat test report

2011-10-06 Thread Robert Leguillon
7th E-Cat test report From: jedrothw...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote: We can only hope and pray that there is more power observed on the secondary than is supplied to the primary during peak energy application. If gains are only observed

Re: [Vo]:July 7th E-Cat test report

2011-10-06 Thread Joe Catania
Message - From: Robert Leguillon To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 1:37 PM Subject: RE: [Vo]:July 7th E-Cat test report I think that you're misunderstanding me. If-And-Only-If the power at the secondary is LESS than the peak power input to the primary