On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 9:17 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
the tobacco industry stopped cancer research;
No, they didn't. They slowed down public acceptance of the danger, and
government action against smoking. But from the earliest evidence, the
medical establishment accepted
[Someone here found Mr. Cage's e-mail address, and suggested I contact
him about the memo. I just sent him this message.]
Subject: Do you recall the intent of this memo?
Dear Mr. Cage,
I run an online library of scientific papers about cold fusion. We have
a bibliography of 3000 papers and
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
[Someone here found Mr. Cage's e-mail address, and suggested I contact him
about the memo. I just sent him this message.]
Subject: Do you recall the intent of this memo?
Dear Mr. Cage,
I gather this is a personal
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
I gather this is a personal email address? After all, I wouldn't
expect him to be working in that job still after almost 23 years.
Correct. He is an impressive person:
The memo is from 1989. That was when PF's cold fusion was popular and the
patent office probably got many thousands of applications in a huge flood.
They would have had to organize a method of segregating them out and
assigning them to specialists who had familiarized themselves with patent
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
They would have had to organize a method of segregating them out and
assigning them to specialists who had familiarized themselves with patent
issues in the field. I suspect that's what the memo was about rather than
some nefarious plot by some unknown
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
The Patent Office did, in fact, suppress cold fusion applications in 1989.
They still do. This is not debatable. All applications are summarily
rejected with a form letter that
It is not in the interest of the US Patent Office or the US government
to suppress cold fusion devices -- to the contrary, discovery of a
robust energy generator that worked with cold fusion would be
spectacular for the economy of the US and would reduce or eliminate
dependence on foreign
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone remember this? In 2002, (or thereabouts), Randell Mills
applied for a patent for his method of creating heat with a device in a
similar fashion to the method that Rossi is using, and his patent was
Craig,
I think it was earlier than that, and you could be referring to Dr. Peter
Zimmerman, not Park. Robin may remember this incident, as it was reported on
HSG forum some years ago.
If memory serves, at the time this person (either Park of PZ or someone else)
protested vehemently - not only
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Needless to say, protecting cushy family jobs was not disclosed, in the
interest of fairness. However, this seems to be a typical motivation for Ivy
League techno-hegemonists with connections to hot fusion ...
I
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
I disagree. Nobody can protect their jobs by suppressing the
greatest discoveries of the last century.
Lots of people made tons of money suppressing the greatest discoveries of
the last century! The dairy industry suppressed pasteurization from 1860 to
12 matches
Mail list logo
