Am 03.09.2011 22:59, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Rossi was upset by Krivit's conclusions from these interviews, and his
long report. So was I. I thought in particular he distorted Levi's
statements about the purpose of the 18-hour test, and the reasons Levi
does not plan to publish the results. As
Am 04.09.2011 09:59, schrieb Peter Heckert:
Am 03.09.2011 22:59, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTnucleartra.pdf
This event was irrefutable proof of a massive, self-sustaining
nuclear reaction. Mizuno has never had any doubt whatever about that.
This is not the
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
This makes me a little bit sceptic about LENR. They research for 20 years
now and still have no repeatable results.
That is incorrect. You need to read the literature more carefully before
commenting on this research. McKubre, Storms and others
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
LENR has all psychosocial attributes that you can find in a religion.
Hey, so does Apple fandom:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13772_3-10071553-52.html
;-)
T
Am 04.09.2011 16:30, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de
wrote:
This makes me a little bit sceptic about LENR. They research for
20 years now and still have no repeatable results.
That is incorrect. You need to read the literature
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 3:59 AM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
LENR has all psychosocial attributes that you can find in a religion.
Hey, so does Apple fandom:
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
10-20% COP is easily explained as measuring error.
Not with the instruments used by McKubre or Storms. If you think it would be
easy I suggest you write a paper explaining how that might work with the
system described here:
Am 04.09.2011 17:23, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de
wrote:
10-20% COP is easily explained as measuring error.
Not with the instruments used by McKubre or Storms. If you think it
would be easy I suggest you write a paper
Hello group,
Here are new video interviews by Steven Krivit made on June during his
visit in Bologna:
June 15, 2011 Video interview of Andrea Rossi
Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II3NxxyxQ0I
Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Xe6YoZVupE
Part 3:
The last 20 seconds of part 4 of the interview were amazing! :D
From Daniel
The last 20 seconds of part 4 of the interview were amazing! :D
Yes, it would appear that Rossi changed his mind. ;-) Very mercurial of him.
As previously speculated, it seems to me that putting a cynic (Krivit) and a
showman (Rossi) in the same interview room is like trying to
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
The last 20 seconds of part 4 of the interview were amazing! :D
Yes, it would appear that Rossi changed his mind. ;-) Very mercurial of
him.
In the last 20 seconds he says Krivit did a very good job. I agree that he
did, in
Jed sez:
...
I understand Levi's point of view. I don't agree with him completely,
but I get it. It is absurd for Krivit to suggest there is something
unethical or unusual about discussing the data with reporters even
though it is not suitable for a formal paper.
...unless one tends to be a
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Krivit
often see evidence of foul play or a conspiracy where there is nothing to be
concerned about, or no issue at all, such as the time he misunderstood
scientific notation.
Those isotope analyses cost someone a
14 matches
Mail list logo
