I'm please to release this document:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B__Wi_DF2CjJNTMyZTdlYjAtYzM3OC00ZGFjLTlkMjAtOWFkYWExODI4NmQ3
AG
What a crock !
I'm 99% certain that Bushnell has not authorized that his name be used for
this, and that you will see this crap pulled immediately - followed by
strong legal action.
Be glad you are in Oz, if you are...
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat
I'm please to release
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I'm 99% certain that Bushnell has not authorized that his name be used for
this, and that you will see this crap pulled immediately - followed by
strong legal action.
That is incorrect. Bushnell is a public figure. Any government official is.
What he
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I'm 99% certain that Bushnell has not authorized that his name be used for
this, and that you will see this crap pulled immediately - followed by
strong legal action.
That is
On 2011-11-25 18:00, Jones Beene wrote:
I'm 99% certain that Bushnell has not authorized that his name be used for
this[...]
I was thinking the same. That phrase has also been taken out of context.
This brochure lacks substance by the way. There are no complete real
photos of the 1MW power
From Beene
What a crock !
I'm 99% certain that Bushnell has not authorized that his name be used
for this, and that you will see this crap pulled immediately -
followed by strong legal action.
Be glad you are in Oz, if you are...
If I were in Bushnell's shoes I'd be pretty steamed
Jed sez:
Jones Beene:
I'm 99% certain that Bushnell has not authorized that his
name be used for this, and that you will see this crap
pulled immediately - followed by strong legal action.
That is incorrect. Bushnell is a public figure. Any government
official is. What he says in public
Hi,
On 25-11-2011 18:37, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
This brochure lacks substance by the way. There are no complete real
photos of the 1MW power plant, very little technical info on it and
almost nothing on the underlying processes other that it essentially
runs on cold fusion.
And who is
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Except that, if I am not mistaken, Bushnell was talking about cold fusion
in general and not, as the lame brochure suggests, about the E-cat in
particular. Using a quote inappropriately to mislead is probably not
within their rights.
I am not a lawyer
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Except that, if I am not mistaken, Bushnell was talking about cold fusion
in general and not, as the lame brochure suggests, about the E-cat in
particular. Using a quote
Dennis Bushnell gave a very pro-LENR presentation at the NASA LENR
Workshop held at GRC on September 22, 2011. I think he may become a
powerful ally of LENR. There is no hint that Bushnell thinks the Rossi
E-Cat may be a scam--only that he has a very early model of a very
important new energy
Ecat sez:
Dennis Bushnell gave a very pro-LENR presentation at the
NASA LENR Workshop held at GRC on September 22, 2011. I think
he may become a powerful ally of LENR. There is no hint that
Bushnell thinks the Rossi E-Cat may be a scam--only that he
has a very early model of a very important
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah yes. But maybe the Sniffex case (fake explosive detector) gives a clue
as to how some judges proceed. At the preliminary hearing of the case in
which Sniffex sued Randi for libel when he called the device a fraud . . .
You have a talent for non
I wrote:
You have a talent for non sequiturs. You are talking about a COMPLETELY
UNRELATED topic. To review:
Topic 1. The use of Bushnell's statement in this brochure, and how that
might be treated in a court case.
I meant in a court case in which Bushnell or NASA is suing to have the
14 matches
Mail list logo
