and in 18th century it is generally forgotten that unified field theory
published
>From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljkovic
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
>From Boscovich's theory to modern quantum theory: Prof Dragoslav Stoiljk...
"From Boscovich's
I videoed a talk by this guy-
Louis Hirsch Kauffman (born February 3, 1945) is an American mathematician,
topologist, and professor of Mathematics in the Department of Mathematics,
Statistics, and Computer science at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
Louis Kauffman
|
|
|
| | |
|
as per my talk this year:
The Vortex Atom: A Victorian Theoryof Everything
Helge Kragh, Centaurus 2002:Vol. 44: pp. 32–114.
Kragh explains that in Victoriantimes there was a unified theory.
That old physics, is missed outfrom being taught physics students. So, they go
through their
Jones Beene wrote:
> P were fully aware of all of this.
>
They were indeed. I think Fleischmann told Mallove about it, and Mallove
included it in his book. Fleischmann read many 19th and early 20th century
journals. He said they were a treasure trove of forgotten discoveries and
good science.
This is the famous Paneth and Peters work which they later withdrew - after
receiving much criticism. They were trying to replicate Tandberg who claimed a
new way to make helium which was in great demand for Airships. Deuterium was
not yet discovered.
P were fully aware of all of this.
How interesting. One wonders what prompted them to look for helium in the
first place.
Was it ordinary hydrogen or heavy hydrogen?
On Sat, 15 Dec 2018 at 15:28, Nigel Dyer wrote:
> While looking for an article in a a copy of Nature from 1926 (as you do) I
> came across the following article
While looking for an article in a a copy of Nature from 1926 (as you do)
I came across the following article describing how small quantities of
helium had been seen when hydrogen was absorbed into palladium at room
temperature. There is nothing new under the sun.
7 matches
Mail list logo
